Howard-Flanders P
Mutat Res. 1981 May;86(3):307-27. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(81)90009-9.
Chemical mutagenesis in animal cells is a complex process. Whereas some chemicals are mutagenic in their original form, others such as the nitrosamines and polycyclic hydrocarbon carcinogens are mutagenic only when enzymatically activated. The active form, or ultimate carcinogen, can interact with proteins and nucleic acids, altering amino acids and producing modified bases in DNA. The modified bases do not usually constitute mutations as produced. Instead they are acted on by the DNA enzymes of the cell, which repair most damaged bases but occasionally insert incorrect base sequences at or near the sites of damage. The frequency at which mutant animal cells are recovered depends upon the selection conditions in culture, upon whether the mutation selected is in a gene present in single or multiple active copies, and upon whether expression is dominant or recessive. Many studies depend on selecting for 8-azaguanine- or 6-thioguanine-resistant mutants, which are due to mutations in the HGPRT locus present in a single active copy on the X-chromosome. Other widely used systems depend on selecting for ouabain resistance, which is dominant and results from a change in the sodium/potassium ATPase activity, or on selecting for thymidine kinase mutants in heterozygous Tk+/Tk- mouse cells. Many other types of mutation including nutritional markers are recessive and express only in cells carrying a single active gene copy, as is sometimes the case in established cell lines. The types of base damage causing mutations have been identified in very few cases only, and little is known about the enzymatic mechanisms of mutagenesis. However, chemical mutagenesis in cultured animal cells provide a practical way of testing chemicals and radiations for mutagenicity directly in animal cells, and much has been learned about the mutagenicity of various carcinogenic substances. To date, there is reasonable qualitative agreement between these results and those obtained in the widely used liver microsome-activated bacterial mutagenesis test systems.
动物细胞中的化学诱变是一个复杂的过程。有些化学物质以其原始形式具有诱变作用,而其他一些物质,如亚硝胺和多环烃致癌物,只有在酶促激活后才具有诱变作用。活性形式或最终致癌物可与蛋白质和核酸相互作用,改变氨基酸并在DNA中产生修饰碱基。这些修饰碱基通常并不构成所产生的突变。相反,它们会受到细胞DNA酶的作用,这些酶会修复大多数受损碱基,但偶尔会在损伤部位或其附近插入错误的碱基序列。回收突变动物细胞的频率取决于培养中的选择条件、所选突变是否存在于单拷贝或多拷贝活性基因中,以及表达是显性还是隐性。许多研究依赖于选择对8-氮杂鸟嘌呤或6-硫代鸟嘌呤有抗性的突变体,这些突变体是由于X染色体上单拷贝活性的次黄嘌呤-鸟嘌呤磷酸核糖转移酶(HGPRT)基因座发生突变所致。其他广泛使用的系统依赖于选择对哇巴因有抗性的细胞,这种抗性是显性的,由钠/钾ATP酶活性的变化引起,或者依赖于在杂合Tk+/Tk-小鼠细胞中选择胸苷激酶突变体。许多其他类型的突变,包括营养标记,都是隐性的,仅在携带单拷贝活性基因的细胞中表达,在已建立的细胞系中有时就是这种情况。仅在极少数情况下确定了导致突变的碱基损伤类型,对于诱变的酶促机制了解甚少。然而,培养动物细胞中的化学诱变提供了一种直接在动物细胞中测试化学物质和辐射致突变性的实用方法,并且已经对各种致癌物质的致突变性有了很多了解。迄今为止,这些结果与在广泛使用的肝微粒体激活细菌诱变测试系统中获得的结果在定性上有合理的一致性。