Sharp W V, Belden T A, King P H, Teague P C
Surgery. 1982 Jan;91(1):61-3.
The emergence of both absorbable and nonabsorbable synthetic materials has been primary among the many new developments in suture materials. This is a study of 16 types of natural and synthetic suture materials and their resistance to both gram-positive and gram-negative infections. Four hundred and twenty suture inplants were made in the Edlich mouse model. The 16 different sutures were compared to appropriate controls and graded by the degree of infectibility. Synthetic sutures were superior in all areas. The monofilament sutures performed better than the multifilament sutures. Lubricating coatings had no effect on infectibility. Natural sutures performed poorly and should not be used in wounds that are potentially susceptible to infection.
可吸收和不可吸收合成材料的出现一直是缝合材料众多新进展中的主要方面。这是一项关于16种天然和合成缝合材料及其对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性感染抵抗力的研究。在埃德利希小鼠模型中植入了420根缝合线。将这16种不同的缝合线与适当的对照进行比较，并根据感染程度进行分级。合成缝合线在所有方面都更具优势。单丝缝合线比多丝缝合线表现更好。润滑涂层对感染性没有影响。天然缝合线表现不佳，不应在可能易受感染的伤口中使用。
