Rodeheaver G T, Beltran K A, Green C W, Faulkner B C, Stiles B M, Stanimir G W, Traeland H, Fried G M, Brown H C, Edlich R F
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1996;6(3-4):181-98.
The clinical and mechanical performance of a new, monofilament, synthetic absorbable suture (Biosyn) was evaluated and compared to that of a braided synthetic absorbable suture (Vicryl). The monofilament synthetic absorbable suture was significantly stronger than the braided synthetic absorbable suture over the 4 weeks of implantation. In addition, the monofilament suture potentiated less bacterial infection than did the braided suture. The handling characteristics of the monofilament suture were superior to the braided suture because the monofilament suture required fewer throws to achieve knot security, encountered lower drag forces in fascia and colon, and had a greater double-wrapped first-throw knot security. Evaluated independently in clinical settings, the monofilament sutures were found to have excellent strength, first-throw hold, knot security, passage through tissue, knot repositioning, and ease of handling.
对一种新型单丝合成可吸收缝线（Biosyn）的临床和机械性能进行了评估，并与编织合成可吸收缝线（Vicryl）进行了比较。在植入的4周内，单丝合成可吸收缝线明显比编织合成可吸收缝线更牢固。此外，单丝缝线比编织缝线引发的细菌感染更少。单丝缝线的操作特性优于编织缝线，因为单丝缝线达到结安全性所需的打结次数更少，在筋膜和结肠中遇到的阻力更低，并且首次双包裹打结的安全性更高。在临床环境中单独评估发现，单丝缝线具有出色的强度、首次打结固定性、结安全性、穿过组织的能力、结重新定位能力和操作便利性。
