Suppr超能文献

用于检测临床标本中拟杆菌属的荧光抗体试验中抗血清的比较。

Comparison of antisera in the fluorescent antibody test for detection of Bacteroides spp in clinical specimens.

作者信息

Wills A, Taylor E, Pantosti A, Phillips I, Tabaqchali S

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1982 Mar;35(3):304-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.3.304.

Abstract

Twenty-two known strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group of organisms and 67 clinical specimens from a variety of sites were examined by fluorescent antibody test (IFA) using two different antisera fro the rapid detection of B fragilis group of organisms. A previously reported Barts' pooled antisera was compared with a commercially produced Fluoretec kit antisera and the findings were related to routine anaerobic culture and gas liquid chromatography for short chain fatty acids. The Barts' antisera was more sensitive (88%) but less specific (88%) than the kit (sensitivity 50%, specificity 98%). This indicates that Barts' antisera picks up more positive cultures than the kit. The predictive value of a positive test was 82% for Barts' antisera and 93% for the kit. There were higher numbers of false-negatives with the kit (13/26) than with the Barts' (3/26). The predictive value of a negative test was 92% for Barts' antisera and 75% for the kit, indicating that a negative IFA test with Barts' antisera is a reliable index of the absence of the B fragilis group of organisms from clinical specimens. The implications for the use of this test in a routine laboratory are discussed.

摘要

使用两种不同抗血清,通过荧光抗体试验(IFA)对22种已知的脆弱拟杆菌属生物体菌株以及来自不同部位的67份临床标本进行检测,以快速检测脆弱拟杆菌属生物体。将先前报道的巴茨混合抗血清与市售的Fluoretec试剂盒抗血清进行比较,结果与常规厌氧培养和短链脂肪酸的气液色谱分析相关。巴茨抗血清比试剂盒更敏感(88%)但特异性更低(88%)(试剂盒敏感性50%,特异性98%)。这表明巴茨抗血清比试剂盒检测到更多阳性培养物。巴茨抗血清阳性检测的预测值为82%,试剂盒为93%。试剂盒的假阴性数量(13/26)高于巴茨抗血清(3/26)。巴茨抗血清阴性检测的预测值为92%,试剂盒为75%,这表明巴茨抗血清IFA检测阴性是临床标本中不存在脆弱拟杆菌属生物体的可靠指标。讨论了该检测方法在常规实验室中的应用意义。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
ANAEROBIC INFECTIONS--REVIEW OF CURRENT EXPERIENCE.厌氧感染——当前经验综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 1964 May;43:207-32. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196405000-00003.
5
Anaerobic infections. 1.厌氧感染。1.
N Engl J Med. 1974 May 23;290(21):1177-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197405232902106.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验