Khorana A B
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1981 Oct-Dec;25(4):331-8.
A double blind therapeutic comparison of single dose administration of imipramine pamoate and divided dose of imipramine hydrochloride was made in 40 indoor patients suffering from depressive illness. A fixed dose of 150 mg was used for both drugs for four weeks, employing randomized methodology with placebo capsules and tablets to balance dosage schedules. Four patients two from each group were dropped, leaving 36 patients for final analysis. The criteria of assessment were Hamilton Rating Scale and global evaluation by both the psychiatrist and the patients. Both the dosage forms were found to be highly effective as anti-depressants. Imipramine pamoate seemed to provide more consistent improvement but statistically the differences were not significant at the end of four weeks treatment. The major conclusion drawn from the study was the confirmation of therapeutic equivalence between a single daily dose of 150 mg of imipramine pamoate and divided dose of 150 mg of imipramine hydrochloride. Generally mild side-effects occurred with equal frequency in both the groups and no adverse effects on haemopoietic, renal or hepatic function were seen with either dosage form.
对40例患有抑郁症的住院患者进行了双盲治疗比较,比较单剂量服用帕罗西汀和分剂量服用盐酸丙咪嗪的效果。两种药物均采用150毫克的固定剂量,持续四周,采用随机方法,使用安慰剂胶囊和片剂来平衡给药方案。每组各有两名患者退出,最终分析时剩下36名患者。评估标准为汉密尔顿评定量表以及精神科医生和患者的整体评估。两种剂型都被发现是非常有效的抗抑郁药。帕罗西汀似乎能提供更持续的改善,但在四周治疗结束时,统计学上差异并不显著。该研究得出的主要结论是,每日单剂量150毫克的帕罗西汀与分剂量150毫克的盐酸丙咪嗪在治疗效果上具有等效性。两组中一般轻度副作用出现的频率相同,两种剂型均未对造血、肾脏或肝脏功能产生不良影响。