Ganguli L A, Turton L J, Tillotson G S
J Clin Pathol. 1982 Apr;35(4):458-61. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.4.458.
Three commercial blood culture media were compared with a freshly prepared cooked meat medium in tests to stimulate the recovery of small inocula of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria in routine blood cultures. The cooked meat medium gave the most reliable recovery and supported continued viability, whilst Fastidious Anaerobe Broth (LAB M) was a good alternative. Results with Southern Group thioglycollate and Difco Thiol were less satisfactory as delays in recovery and loss of viability occurred on continued incubation with some of the test strains.
在常规血培养中,为促进厌氧和需氧菌小接种量的复苏,对三种商业血培养基与新鲜制备的庖肉培养基进行了比较。庖肉培养基的复苏最可靠,并能维持细菌的持续生存能力,而苛求厌氧菌肉汤(LAB M)是一个很好的替代选择。南方集团硫乙醇酸盐培养基和Difco硫醇培养基的结果不太令人满意,因为在对一些测试菌株进行持续培养时出现了复苏延迟和生存能力丧失的情况。