Beyer J, Beckenlechner P, Messmer K
Intensive Care Med. 1982 Mar;8(2):75-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01694870.
In an experimental study including 10 dogs with intact lungs (group I) and 10 dogs with oleic acid-induced pulmonary edema (group II), the effects of PEEP 10 and 20 (cm H20) on central hemodynamics, lung function, organ blood flow and tissue PO2 (liver and skeletal muscle) were examined. In both groups, PEEP resulted in a significant fall of cardiac output (CO) despite volume substitution. In group I, flow was redistributed favouring brain, heart, kidneys, and adrenals, at the expense of stomach, pancreas and and thyroid gland. Animals with pulmonary edema and consequently lower absolute values of CO showed a more uniform reduction of organ perfusion sparing only brain and heart PEEP 10 led to a marginal improvement of tissue oxygenation, whereas PEEP 20 resulted in a deterioration of local PO2 associated with a decrease in O2 transport. It is concluded that whenever PEEP is applied, a reduction and redistribution of CO may occur possibly jeopardizing tissue oxygenation and thus interfering with organ function.
在一项实验研究中,对10只肺功能正常的犬(I组)和10只油酸诱导的肺水肿犬(II组),研究了10和20(厘米水柱)的呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对中心血流动力学、肺功能、器官血流及组织氧分压(肝脏和骨骼肌)的影响。在两组中,尽管进行了容量补充,PEEP仍导致心输出量(CO)显著下降。在I组中,血流重新分布,有利于脑、心脏、肾脏和肾上腺,代价是胃、胰腺和甲状腺。患有肺水肿且因此CO绝对值较低的动物,器官灌注的减少更为均匀,仅脑和心脏得以 spared。PEEP 10使组织氧合略有改善,而PEEP 20导致局部氧分压恶化并伴有氧输送减少。得出的结论是,无论何时应用PEEP,都可能发生CO的降低和重新分布,这可能危及组织氧合,从而干扰器官功能。 (注:原文中“sparing only brain and heart”处“spared”疑似拼写错误,推测应为“sparing”,翻译时按推测翻译,供你参考。)