King R F, Norton T, Hill G L
Aust N Z J Surg. 1982 Apr;52(2):121-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1982.tb06083.x.
Loperamide hydrochloride (4 mg t.d.s.) was compared with codeine phosphate (60 mg t.d.s.) in a double blind crossover study of patients with loose output from their ileostomies. Both drugs significantly decreased the daily output and water content of ileostomy fluid. Daily losses of sodium and potassium were less when the patients were treated with loperamide. Loperamide was also associated with less side effects. It is concluded that loperamide hydrochloride was more effective in the treatment of ileostomy diarrhoea than codeine phosphate. In this group of patients those with the highest outputs from their ileostomies benefited most from this treatment.
在一项针对回肠造口术患者粪便稀溏的双盲交叉研究中,将盐酸洛哌丁胺(每日3次,每次4毫克)与磷酸可待因(每日3次,每次60毫克)进行了比较。两种药物均显著降低了回肠造口液的日排出量和含水量。患者接受洛哌丁胺治疗时,钠和钾的每日丢失量较少。洛哌丁胺的副作用也较少。得出的结论是,盐酸洛哌丁胺在治疗回肠造口术腹泻方面比磷酸可待因更有效。在这组患者中,回肠造口排出量最高的患者从该治疗中获益最大。