Treharne J D
Infection. 1982;10 Suppl 1:S25-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01640711.
Satisfactory methods for the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis have been widely discussed in recent years. Until a decade ago, the complement-fixation test measuring group-specific antibody was the most widely applied technique. However, despite showing relatively high diagnostic sensitivity in systemic chlamydial infections, it is of little value in the serodiagnosis of localized chlamydial oculo-genital infections or of trachoma. The more recently developed microimmunofluorescence (micro-IF) test is not only a very sensitive technique, but can also reach a high degree of serodiagnostic specificity in certain chlamydial infections. Unlike the complement-fixation test, it measures type-specific antibody which may be directed against one or more C trachomatis serotypes. By nature, chlamydia infections often lead to high background rates of antibody in affected populations. Interpretation of serological results may therefore be difficult, particularly when only single-serum samples are available. However, in seroepidemiological work, in the study of transmission patterns and in the detection of predominant serotypes in a community, the micro-IF test is especially valuable, and if results are interpreted with care, the test may also serve as an indicator of chlamydial infection. The predictability, sensitivity and specificity of serological tests for C. trachomatis will be discussed.
近年来,关于沙眼衣原体血清学诊断的满意方法已得到广泛讨论。直到十年前,检测群特异性抗体的补体结合试验仍是应用最广泛的技术。然而,尽管它在全身性衣原体感染中显示出相对较高的诊断敏感性,但在局部衣原体眼部和生殖器感染或沙眼的血清学诊断中价值不大。最近开发的微量免疫荧光(micro-IF)试验不仅是一种非常敏感的技术,而且在某些衣原体感染中还能达到高度的血清学诊断特异性。与补体结合试验不同,它检测的是型特异性抗体,这种抗体可能针对一种或多种沙眼衣原体血清型。从本质上讲,衣原体感染常常导致受感染人群中抗体的高背景率。因此,血清学结果的解释可能很困难,尤其是当只有单份血清样本可用时。然而,在血清流行病学研究、传播模式研究以及社区中主要血清型的检测中,微量免疫荧光试验特别有价值,并且如果谨慎解释结果,该试验也可作为衣原体感染的一个指标。本文将讨论沙眼衣原体血清学检测的可预测性、敏感性和特异性。