• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾外伤后的脾保留

Splenic preservation following splenic trauma.

作者信息

Traub A C, Perry J F

出版信息

J Trauma. 1982 Jun;22(6):496-501. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198206000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-198206000-00010
PMID:7045385
Abstract

Increased awareness of the problem of overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis has aroused interest in methods of splenic preservation in patients with abdominal trauma. In the past 6 years, we have treated 272 patients for splenic trauma at our institution, 41 of whom underwent splenic preservation. Mortality rates in those undergoing splenectomy vs. preservation were 23.4% and 4.9%, respectively, severe head injuries constituting cause of death in the latter. Overall morbidity in the two groups was not significantly different (40.7% vs. 39%). Pulmonary complications were predominant in both groups (splenectomy, 27.7%; splenic preservation, 23.1%) with atelectasis more common in the latter. Three subphrenic abscesses occurred in the splenectomy group, none in the repair group. Sepsis was twice as frequent in the splenectomy group (8.7% vs. 4.9%). Mode of injury was slightly more severe in the splenectomy group with these patients sustaining mor chest, spine, associated intra-abdominal, and vascular injuries, thus accounting for the high mortality. Average operative time was not increased by addition of repair (2 hr 54 min vs. 2 hr 33 min). Only on repair required return to the operating room, because of a missed hilar laceration at the original laparotomy, emphasizing the importance of care in technique. Postoperative scans in selected patients showed good functional activity. We conclude that splenic preservation is a technically safe procedure in patients exhibiting hemodynamic stability.

摘要

对脾切除术后严重感染问题认识的提高,引发了人们对腹部创伤患者脾保留方法的兴趣。在过去6年中,我们机构共治疗了272例脾外伤患者,其中41例接受了脾保留治疗。脾切除组与脾保留组的死亡率分别为23.4%和4.9%,后者的死亡原因是严重的头部损伤。两组的总体发病率无显著差异(40.7%对39%)。两组肺部并发症均占主导(脾切除组为27.7%;脾保留组为23.1%),肺不张在后者中更为常见。脾切除组发生了3例膈下脓肿,修复组未发生。脾切除组的感染发生率是后者的两倍(8.7%对4.9%)。脾切除组的损伤方式略为严重,这些患者合并更多的胸部、脊柱、腹部及血管损伤,这也是导致高死亡率的原因。增加修复操作并未延长平均手术时间(2小时54分钟对2小时33分钟)。仅1例修复患者因初次剖腹探查时遗漏肝门撕裂伤而需再次手术,这强调了手术技巧的重要性。部分患者术后扫描显示脾功能良好。我们得出结论,对于血流动力学稳定的患者,脾保留是一种技术上安全的手术。

相似文献

1
Splenic preservation following splenic trauma.脾外伤后的脾保留
J Trauma. 1982 Jun;22(6):496-501. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198206000-00010.
2
Surgical Repair vs Splenectomy in Patients With Severe Traumatic Spleen Injuries.严重创伤性脾损伤患者的手术修复与脾切除术。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425300. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25300.
3
Is splenic salvage safe in the traumatized patient?在创伤患者中进行脾脏挽救是否安全?
Arch Surg. 1981 May;116(5):651-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380170127023.
4
[Treatment of traumatic injuries of the spleen. Retrospective analysis of 164 cases].[脾外伤的治疗。164例回顾性分析]
Minerva Chir. 1994 Oct;49(10):891-905.
5
Complications of splenectomy for splenic injury.脾损伤脾切除术的并发症。
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1994 Jun;17(2):125-30.
6
[Operative risk of splenic repair for isolated but complex splenic injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma].[钝性腹部创伤所致孤立性但复杂脾损伤的脾修复手术风险]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Feb;93(2):177-82.
7
Blunt splenic trauma: diagnosis and management.钝性脾损伤:诊断与处理
Can J Surg. 1984 Jul;27(4):330-3.
8
Trends in the management of splenic trauma.脾损伤的治疗趋势
Wis Med J. 1990 Jun;89(6):267-70.
9
The management of splenic injury.脾损伤的处理
J Trauma. 1982 Jun;22(6):492-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198206000-00009.
10
Randomized clinical trial of ligasure™ versus conventional splenectomy for injured spleen in blunt abdominal trauma.随机对照临床试验:Ligasure™ 与传统脾脏切除术治疗钝性腹部创伤脾损伤的比较。
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.036. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Repair vs Splenectomy in Patients With Severe Traumatic Spleen Injuries.严重创伤性脾损伤患者的手术修复与脾切除术。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425300. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25300.
2
Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) as a hemostatic in laparoscopic conservative treatment of spleen trauma.纤维蛋白胶(Tissucol)在腹腔镜保守治疗脾外伤中作为止血剂的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2051-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9288-7. Epub 2007 May 5.
3
Splenic trauma in children and techniques of splenic salvage.儿童脾外伤及脾挽救技术
World J Surg. 1985 Jun;9(3):398-409. doi: 10.1007/BF01655274.
4
Surgery of the traumatized spleen.
World J Surg. 1985 Jun;9(3):391-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01655273.
5
[Differential indications of conservative and surgical possibilities of treating splenic rupture].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1986;369:372-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01274393.
6
Splenorrhaphy. The alternative.脾修补术。另一种选择。
Ann Surg. 1990 May;211(5):569-80; discussion 580-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199005000-00007.