Cavalli F, Beer M, Martz G, Jungi W F, Alberto P, Obrecht J P, Mermillod B, Brunner K W
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1982 May 29;112(22):774-83.
Since in the treatment of advanced breast cancer chemotherapy and the various hormonal manipulations seem recently to have reached a plateau of effectiveness when used alone, it is widely assumed that the combination of both treatment modalities could improve therapeutic results. The outcome is reported of a study encompassing 109 pre- and 297 postmenopausal evaluable cases with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer. The patients were randomized either to a concurrent chemo/hormonotherapy or to the hormonal treatment alone, chemotherapy being delayed until the occurrence of tumor progression. All patients were further randomized to 3 chemotherapy regimens (LMFP, LMP/FVP, LMFP/ADM) representing three different degrees of intensity. Pre-menopausal patients tend to live longer with the concurrent combination of both modalities, whereas postmenopausal patients fare better when chemotherapy is delayed until the occurrence of tumor progression with hormonotherapy alone. However, the differences in survival are statistically significant only in postmenopausal patients with a less aggressive tumor ("low-risk"). The more aggressive cytotoxic combinations elicit higher response rates than "minimal chemotherapy", but the differences translate only marginally into different survivals. These findings are discussed with regard in particular to their importance in establishing widely acceptable therapeutic rules for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
由于在晚期乳腺癌的治疗中,化疗和各种激素治疗方法单独使用时似乎已达到疗效的平台期,因此人们普遍认为将这两种治疗方式结合起来可能会改善治疗效果。本文报道了一项涵盖109例绝经前和297例绝经后可评估病例的研究结果,这些病例均为先前未经治疗的转移性乳腺癌。患者被随机分为同时进行化疗/激素治疗组或单独进行激素治疗组,化疗推迟至肿瘤进展时进行。所有患者进一步随机分为3种化疗方案(LMFP、LMP/FVP、LMFP/ADM),代表三种不同程度的强度。绝经前患者同时采用两种治疗方式往往生存期更长,而绝经后患者在化疗推迟至肿瘤进展时仅进行激素治疗时效果更好。然而,仅在肿瘤侵袭性较小的绝经后患者(“低风险”)中,生存差异具有统计学意义。更具侵袭性的细胞毒性联合治疗比“最小化疗”引发更高的缓解率,但这些差异仅略微转化为不同的生存期。本文特别讨论了这些发现对于制定广泛可接受的晚期乳腺癌治疗规则的重要性。