Suppr超能文献

直接检测血培养物以检测链球菌抗原。

Direct testing of blood cultures for detection of streptococcal antigens.

作者信息

Wetkowski M A, Peterson E M, de la Maza L M

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):86-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.86-91.1982.

Abstract

A direct, rapid, and simple method for the detection of streptococcal antigens of Lancefield groups A, B, C, D, and G from blood cultures was developed by using a coagglutination test. Fifty-five clinical specimens and 117 simulated blood cultures containing gram-positive cocci were tested. Out of 6,261 clinical blood cultures screened, 55 cultures from 53 patients were positive, with organisms resembling streptococci, by Gram stain. Of these cultures, 78% (43 of 55) were pure cultures of streptococci, and 22% (12 of 55) were mixed with at least one other organism. Of the 43 pure cultures only, correct reactions were obtained (grouping correctly or giving no cross-reactions, or both) with 86% (37 of 43) of the isolates, 12% (5 of 43) exhibited cross-reactions, and 2% (1 of 43) gave false-negative reactions. All of the cross-reacting isolates were Streptococcus pneumoniae, which reacted with the group C reagent, and the false-negative reaction occurred with a Streptococcus bovis isolate. However, by using a direct modified bile solubility test, the correct identification of the S. pneumoniae isolates was obtained. Therefore, by using the modified bile solubility test in conjunction with the direct grouping method, 98% (42 of 43) of the isolates in pure culture could be identified accurately and rapidly after the detection of a positive Gram stain. Correct grouping reactions were obtained with 83% (10 of 12) of the mixed blood cultures, and false-negative results occurred with 17% (2 of 12) of them. Both cultures contained an enterococcus and a gram-negative rod. Of the 117 simulated blood cultures, there was only one incorrect grouping reaction; this occurred with an S. bovis isolate that cross-reacted with the group C reagent. The direct grouping reaction was positive when blood cultures contained a minimum of 1 x 10(8) to 8 x 10(8) colony-forming units per ml. In general, this procedure provided information on the identification of the organism 24 h earlier than by conventional identification methods.

摘要

通过协同凝集试验开发了一种直接、快速且简单的方法,用于检测血培养中A、B、C、D和G群兰氏链球菌抗原。对55份临床标本和117份含有革兰氏阳性球菌的模拟血培养物进行了检测。在筛查的6261份临床血培养物中,53例患者的55份培养物经革兰氏染色显示有类似链球菌的微生物生长而呈阳性。在这些培养物中,78%(55份中的43份)为链球菌纯培养物,22%(55份中的12份)与至少一种其他微生物混合。仅在43份纯培养物中,86%(43份中的37份)的分离株获得了正确反应(正确分组或无交叉反应,或两者皆有),12%(43份中的5份)出现交叉反应,2%(43份中的1份)出现假阴性反应。所有交叉反应的分离株均为肺炎链球菌,其与C群试剂发生反应,假阴性反应发生在一株牛链球菌分离株上。然而,通过使用直接改良胆汁溶解试验,肺炎链球菌分离株得到了正确鉴定。因此,通过将改良胆汁溶解试验与直接分组方法结合使用,在革兰氏染色呈阳性检测后,98%(43份中的42份)的纯培养分离株能够被准确快速地鉴定。83%(12份中的10份)的混合血培养物获得了正确分组反应,17%(12份中的2份)出现假阴性结果。这两份培养物均含有一种肠球菌和一种革兰氏阴性杆菌。在117份模拟血培养物中,只有一次分组反应错误;这发生在一株与C群试剂发生交叉反应的牛链球菌分离株上。当血培养物每毫升至少含有1×10⁸至8×10⁸个菌落形成单位时,直接分组反应呈阳性。一般来说,该方法比传统鉴定方法提前24小时提供有关微生物鉴定的信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验