• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为环境诱变剂检测方法的DNA修复检测。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划报告。

DNA repair assays as tests for environmental mutagens. A report of the U.S. EPA Gene-Tox Program.

作者信息

Larsen K H, Brash D, Cleaver J E, Hart R W, Maher V M, Painter R B, Sega G A

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1982 May;98(3):287-318. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90037-9.

DOI:10.1016/0165-1110(82)90037-9
PMID:7050696
Abstract

A literature review was undertaken to determine the usefulness of DNA repair assays, other than unscheduled DNA synthesis, as screening techniques for mutagenic carcinogens. 92 reports were found to contain useful data for 49 chemicals using 6 techniques, namely, (1) cesium chloride equilibrium density gradients to study repair replication, (2) benzoylated naphthoylated diethylaminoethyl cellulose columns to study repair replication, (3) 313-nm irradiation of DNA containing bromodeoxyuridine to study repair replication, (4) alkaline elution to study repair of single-strand breaks and crosslinks, (5) alkaline sucrose gradients to study repair of single-strand breaks, and (6) direct assays for removal of adducts from DNA. Almost all of the 49 chemicals studied were known mutagens or carcinogens and/or known inducers of DNA repair, 9 compounds failed to elicit DNA repair by at least 1 assay technique, and at least 3 of these were not tested by the most appropriate and sensitive method. Nevertheless, although valid for studying repair phenomena in eukaryotic cells, these assays are not considered useful for screening. They are time-consuming, expensive, and/or require highly specialized skills. Despite the high frequency of positive reports, it is obvious from the literature that repair assays will fail to detect, or will detect with low efficiency, those agents whose main action is either intercalation or induction of strand breaks. For these and other reasons, DNA repair as a basis for screening for mutagenic carcinogens is not considered to be a useful concept.

摘要

进行了一项文献综述,以确定除了非预定DNA合成之外的DNA修复检测方法作为诱变致癌物筛选技术的实用性。发现92篇报告包含使用6种技术对49种化学物质的有用数据,这6种技术分别是:(1)氯化铯平衡密度梯度法研究修复复制;(2)苯甲酰化萘甲酰化二乙氨基乙基纤维素柱法研究修复复制;(3)含溴脱氧尿苷的DNA经313纳米照射研究修复复制;(4)碱性洗脱法研究单链断裂和交联的修复;(5)碱性蔗糖梯度法研究单链断裂的修复;(6)从DNA中去除加合物的直接检测法。所研究的49种化学物质几乎都是已知的诱变剂或致癌物和/或已知的DNA修复诱导剂,9种化合物至少通过1种检测技术未能引发DNA修复,其中至少3种未通过最恰当和最灵敏的方法进行检测。然而,尽管这些检测方法对于研究真核细胞中的修复现象有效,但并不认为它们适用于筛选。它们耗时、昂贵且/或需要高度专业化的技能。尽管阳性报告的频率很高,但从文献中明显可以看出,修复检测将无法检测到或以低效率检测到那些主要作用是嵌入或诱导链断裂的物质。由于这些及其他原因,基于DNA修复来筛选诱变致癌物不被认为是一个有用的概念。

相似文献

1
DNA repair assays as tests for environmental mutagens. A report of the U.S. EPA Gene-Tox Program.作为环境诱变剂检测方法的DNA修复检测。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划报告。
Mutat Res. 1982 May;98(3):287-318. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90037-9.
2
An investigation of DNA-repair phenomena induced by 4-chloromethylbiphenyl (4CMB).4-氯甲基联苯(4CMB)诱导的DNA修复现象研究。
Mutat Res. 1982 Jan-Feb;100(1-4):211-4. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(82)90046-5.
3
Mutagen assay with Arabidopsis. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.拟南芥诱变试验。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划报告。
Mutat Res. 1982 Sep;99(2):243-55.
4
An evaluation of the host-mediated assay and body fluid analysis. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.宿主介导试验与体液分析评估。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划报告。
Mutat Res. 1982 May;98(3):319-74. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90038-0.
5
An approach to identifying specialized batteries of bioassays for specific classes of chemicals: class analysis using mutagenicity and carcinogenicity relationships and phylogenetic concordance and discordance patterns. 1. Composition and analysis of the overall data base. A report of phase II of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.一种识别特定化学物质类别的生物测定专门组合的方法:利用致突变性和致癌性的关系以及系统发育一致性和不一致性模式进行类别分析。1. 总体数据库的组成与分析。美国环境保护局基因毒性计划第二阶段报告
Mutat Res. 1987 May;185(3):197-241. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(87)90018-2.
6
Comparative evaluation of different pairs of DNA repair-deficient and DNA repair-proficient bacterial tester strains for rapid detection of chemical mutagens and carcinogens.用于快速检测化学诱变剂和致癌物的不同DNA修复缺陷型与DNA修复 proficient型细菌测试菌株对的比较评估 。 注:原文中“DNA repair-proficient”表述有误,可能是“DNA repair-proficient”,正确意思是“DNA修复 proficient型”,这里按“ proficient型”翻译,你可根据实际修正。
Mutat Res. 1982 Feb;97(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(82)90015-2.
7
Evaluation of the alkaline elution/rat hepatocyte assay as a predictor of carcinogenic/mutagenic potential.
Mutat Res. 1983 Aug;113(5):357-91. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(83)90228-5.
8
Unscheduled DNA synthesis tests. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
Mutat Res. 1983 Dec;123(3):363-410. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(83)90029-5.
9
Evaluation of a genotoxicity test measuring DNA-strand breaks in mouse lymphoma cells by alkaline unwinding and hydroxyapatite elution.通过碱性解旋和羟基磷灰石洗脱法评估在小鼠淋巴瘤细胞中测量DNA链断裂的遗传毒性试验。
Mutat Res. 1988 Jun;203(3):155-76. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(88)90101-x.
10
DNA-synthesis inhibition and repair DNA-synthesis in CHO Ade-C cells: an alternative approach to genotoxicity testing.DNA合成抑制与修复:CHO Ade-C细胞中的DNA合成——一种遗传毒性测试的替代方法
Neoplasma. 1997;44(4):247-52.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis by genotoxic carcinogens in the hepatocytes of the oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau).
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1985 Sep;14(5):555-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01055385.
2
Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.化学致癌物:科学及其相关原理综述。美国致癌物问题跨部门工作人员小组
Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Aug;67:201-82. doi: 10.1289/ehp.67-1474412.
3
Biomonitoring of DNA damage by alkaline filter elution.通过碱性滤膜洗脱法对DNA损伤进行生物监测。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;60(3):169-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00378693.
4
Alkali-labile sites in daughter DNA of damaged Escherichia coli do not reflect apyrimidinic sites.
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1991;36(6):585-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02884042.