Suppr超能文献

单独使用甲氧苄啶治疗尿路感染:芬兰八年的经验

Trimethoprim alone in the treatment of urinary tract infections: eight years of experience in Finland.

作者信息

Kasanen A, Sundquist H

出版信息

Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):358-65. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.2.358.

Abstract

In Finland the usage of trimethoprim (TMP) alone constitutes about 25% of all drug usage for urinary tract infections. Despite this widespread use the proportion of TMP-resistant strains is almost same as it is in countries where only the combination of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) has been used. In general, strains resistant to TMP were seldom found; only in closed wards did the use of trimethoprim result in an increase in the proportion of resistant strains. In the treatment of acute urinary tract infections, TMP alone (dose, 160 mg taken twice daily for seven days) gave a result as good as that of TMP-SMZ (94.5% vs. 90.6%) and a better result than cephalexin (98.3% vs. 82.1%). TMP proved suitable as a single agent in the treatment of urinary tract infections in outpatients. In a study of long-term treatment, TMP (dose, 100 mg taken once daily), was more effective than nitrofurantoin, methenamine hippurate, TMP-SMZ, or placebo. Fewer adverse effects were associated with TMP than with the other drugs.

摘要

在芬兰,单独使用甲氧苄啶(TMP)约占所有治疗尿路感染药物使用量的25%。尽管使用广泛,但耐TMP菌株的比例与仅使用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMZ)联合制剂的国家几乎相同。一般来说,很少发现耐TMP的菌株;仅在封闭病房中,使用甲氧苄啶会导致耐药菌株比例增加。在治疗急性尿路感染时,单独使用TMP(剂量为每日两次,每次160毫克,连用7天)的效果与TMP-SMZ相当(94.5%对90.6%),且优于头孢氨苄(98.3%对82.1%)。TMP被证明适合作为门诊治疗尿路感染的单一药物。在一项长期治疗研究中,TMP(剂量为每日一次,每次100毫克)比呋喃妥因、马尿酸乌洛托品、TMP-SMZ或安慰剂更有效。与其他药物相比,TMP的不良反应更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验