• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压治疗中的过程与结果:一项阳性结果。

Process versus outcome in hypertension: a positive result.

作者信息

Haynes R B, Gibson E S, Taylor D W, Bernholz C D, Sackett D L

出版信息

Circulation. 1982 Jan;65(1):28-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.28.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.65.1.28
PMID:7053286
Abstract

We studied the association between the outcome of antihypertensive care and three items of that care among 230 hypertensive steelworkers who were referred to 83 physicians. The first item was the decision to treat some patients but not others: 63% of the patients were prescribed antihypertensive drugs and the mean decrease in their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was greater than that among untreated patients (12.2 +/- 0.84 vs 7.8 +/- 0.83 mm Hg [+/- SEM], p less than 0.001). The second item was the vigor of prescribed medication: Patients prescribed more vigorous treatments had lower DBP (p less than 0.005). Third, patient compliance was related to achieving a goal DBP of less than 90 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) and the product of prescribed vigor and compliance was highly associated with DBP response (p less than 0.0001). These results stand in contrast to those of previous studies that failed to detect associations between various other items of the care process and the outcome of antihypertensive care.

摘要

我们研究了230名被转诊至83位医生处的高血压钢铁工人的降压治疗结果与三项治疗措施之间的关联。第一项措施是决定对部分患者进行治疗而不对其他患者进行治疗:63%的患者被开了降压药,他们的舒张压(DBP)平均降幅大于未治疗患者(12.2±0.84 vs 7.8±0.83 mmHg [±SEM],p<0.001)。第二项措施是所开药物治疗的力度:接受更强力治疗的患者DBP较低(p<0.005)。第三,患者的依从性与实现DBP目标值低于90 mmHg相关(p<0.05),且所开药物治疗力度与依从性的乘积与DBP反应高度相关(p<0.0001)。这些结果与之前的研究结果形成对比,之前的研究未能发现治疗过程中的其他各项措施与降压治疗结果之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Process versus outcome in hypertension: a positive result.高血压治疗中的过程与结果:一项阳性结果。
Circulation. 1982 Jan;65(1):28-33. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.28.
2
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
3
A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control.一种用于监测和辅导高血压患者的电信系统。对药物依从性和血压控制的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Apr;9(4 Pt 1):285-92. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00353-3.
4
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
5
Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures: a retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium.使用医生单项目测量法预测血压结果:比利时观察性研究的回顾性汇总分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jan;65(630):e9-15. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683101.
6
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
7
A Randomized, Double-blind, Candesartan-controlled, Parallel Group Comparison Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension.一项随机、双盲、坎地沙坦对照、平行组比较的临床试验,旨在评估非马沙坦对轻至中度原发性高血压患者的降压疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1485-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Influence of age and hypertension treatment-time on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients.年龄和高血压治疗时间对高血压患者动态血压的影响。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Mar;30(1-2):176-91. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.701131. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
9
Nebivolol monotherapy for patients with systolic stage II hypertension: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.比索洛尔单药治疗收缩期 II 期高血压患者:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Clin Ther. 2013 Feb;35(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension.双重α和β受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 26;2015(8):CD007449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing clinical inertia in hypertension treatment: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.减少高血压治疗中的临床惰性:一项实用随机对照试验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 May;14(5):322-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00607.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
2
Does ambulatory process of care predict health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with chronic disease?慢性病患者的门诊护理流程能否预测其健康相关生活质量结果?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):63-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00604.x.
3
Dose-response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.
磺脲类药物与2型糖尿病患者死亡率之间的剂量反应关系:一项基于人群的队列研究。
CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;174(2):169-74. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050748.
4
Quality of care for hypertension in the United States.美国高血压的护理质量。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jan 7;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-5-1.
5
Medication non-adherence in the elderly: how big is the problem?老年人用药依从性问题:该问题有多严重?
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(12):793-811. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421120-00004.
6
Unmet needs in hypertension: challenges and opportunities.高血压未满足的需求:挑战与机遇
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Dec;1(6):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0021-z.
7
Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.高血压治疗中选择性与非选择性β肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂的比较
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):513-23. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00006.
8
Compliance with antihypertensive therapy among elderly Medicaid enrollees: the roles of age, gender, and race.老年医疗补助计划参保者的降压治疗依从性:年龄、性别和种族的作用
Am J Public Health. 1996 Dec;86(12):1805-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1805.
9
How to read clinical journals: VI. To learn about the quality of clinical care.如何阅读临床期刊:六、了解临床护理质量。
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Feb 15;130(4):377-81.
10
Use of management-by-objective for the case finding and treatment of hypertension.采用目标管理法进行高血压病例发现与治疗。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Jan;36(282):17-8.