Michalewski H J, Patterson J V, Bowman T E, Litzleman D K, Thompson L W
J Gerontol. 1982 Jan;37(1):52-8. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.1.52.
An emitted potential paradigm was used to investigate P3 scalp potentials in a group of older individuals (M = 66.8 years) and a group of younger persons (M = 22.0 years). Since no physical stimulus is necessary to elicit an emitted potential, an age comparison of P3 can be made which does not depend on normal sensory transmission channels. Both traditional and latency corrected averages to missing auditory clicks were analyzed from electrodes placed over midline frontal, central, and parietal locations. Results indicated that while the scalp distribution of emitted potentials was similar for both age groups, amplitudes at Pz and Cz were significantly smaller in the older group. Latency corrected potentials indicated similar trends but did not reach significant levels. No group differences were seen for N2 or P3 latencies for either traditional or corrected averages. The findings support age differences in the amplitudes of the P3 component and suggest that when P3 is not synchronized with a sensory event, latencies in this component may not be sensitive to age differences.
采用发出电位范式研究了一组老年人(平均年龄66.8岁)和一组年轻人(平均年龄22.0岁)的P3头皮电位。由于引发发出电位无需物理刺激,因此可以对P3进行年龄比较,且这种比较不依赖于正常的感觉传导通路。分析了放置在额中线、中央和顶叶位置的电极对缺失听觉滴答声的传统平均值和潜伏期校正平均值。结果表明,虽然两个年龄组发出电位的头皮分布相似,但老年组Pz和Cz处的波幅明显较小。潜伏期校正电位显示出类似趋势,但未达到显著水平。传统平均值或校正平均值的N2或P3潜伏期在两组之间均未观察到差异。这些发现支持了P3成分波幅存在年龄差异,并表明当P3与感觉事件不同步时,该成分的潜伏期可能对年龄差异不敏感。