Wolff G S, Kaiser G, Casta A, Pickoff A S, Mehta A V, Tamer D, Garica O L, Ferrer P L, Smith K, Gelband H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Jan;83(1):141-8.
Ninety-three rapid atrial pacing studies were performed in 38 children to compare preoperative and early postoperative function of the sinus and atrioventricular (AV) nodes. The interval between the preoperative and postoperative studies was under 6 months in the majority of patients. Postoperative studies were performed within 48 hours of operation and between 4 and 8 days after operation. Sinus nodal function as measured by sinus nodal recovery time (SNRT) was an unreliable index in determining depression since the number who improved postoperatively (10/55) was nearly equal to the number that worsened (12/55). The majority who had abnormal function postoperatively demonstrated a junctional rather than sinus recovery focus. This finding appears a more definitive and more reproducible indicator of sinus node depression in the postoperative patient. Postoperative AV nodal function was decreased (as measured by the cycle length [CL] at which Wenckebach periodicity occurred) in 15 of 55 studies (27%) of the entire group. There was nearly an equal chance for improvement (24%) in function. This also applied to those patients who had sequential studies. Therefore, this method of assessment for AV nodal function was unreliable, or else the operation did not affect the node significantly. The latter is unlikely in view of late postoperative data. The greatest utility of this test was to determine the capability for AV conduction in certain patients with slow escape rhythms in the absence of surface P waves, and to differentiate complete heart block from AV dissociation when atrial activity was absent. Despite the variability of effects on the sinus and AV nodes in these patients, those who demonstrated depression had a significantly higher incidence of dysrhythmias (80% of patients with sinus nodal depression and 100% of patients with AV nodal depression).
对38名儿童进行了93项快速心房起搏研究,以比较窦房结和房室(AV)结的术前和术后早期功能。大多数患者术前和术后研究的间隔时间在6个月以内。术后研究在术后48小时内以及术后4至8天进行。用窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)测量的窦房结功能在确定抑制方面是一个不可靠的指标,因为术后改善的人数(10/55)几乎与恶化的人数(12/55)相等。术后功能异常的大多数患者表现为交界性而非窦房结恢复焦点。这一发现似乎是术后患者窦房结抑制的一个更明确、更可重复的指标。在整个组的55项研究中的15项(27%)中,术后房室结功能下降(通过出现文氏周期的周期长度[CL]测量)。功能改善的可能性几乎相等(24%)。这也适用于那些进行了连续研究的患者。因此,这种评估房室结功能的方法不可靠,否则手术对该结没有显著影响。从术后晚期数据来看,后者不太可能。这项测试的最大用途是确定某些无体表P波、逸搏心律缓慢的患者的房室传导能力,以及在无房性活动时区分完全性心脏传导阻滞和房室分离。尽管这些患者对窦房结和房室结的影响存在差异,但表现出抑制的患者心律失常的发生率显著更高(窦房结抑制患者中有80%,房室结抑制患者中有100%)。