Thompson W D, Orvaschel H, Prusoff B A, Kidd K K
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;39(1):53-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290010031006.
This methodologic study assessed the accuracy of family history data in ascertaining psychiatric disorders in relatives. Comparison of diagnoses based on family history with diagnoses based on direct interview indicated that the specificity for the family history method is high, but that the sensitivity is generally low. Accuracy was better for affective disorders and alcoholism than for less severe disorders; spouses and offspring provided more accurate information than parents and siblings. The use of multiple information increased sensitivity somewhat, with little adverse effect on specificity. However, because errors were often correlated when more than one person provided information about a particular relative, the use of multiple informants generally did not improve accuracy substantially. Analysis of family-genetic studies should take account of the differential quality of data obtained by the family history method vs direct interview.
这项方法学研究评估了家族史数据在确定亲属精神疾病方面的准确性。基于家族史的诊断与基于直接访谈的诊断相比较表明,家族史方法的特异性较高,但敏感性通常较低。情感障碍和酒精中毒的诊断准确性优于不太严重的疾病;配偶和子女提供的信息比父母和兄弟姐妹更准确。使用多条信息在一定程度上提高了敏感性,对特异性几乎没有不利影响。然而,由于当不止一人提供关于某个特定亲属的信息时,错误往往相互关联,使用多个信息提供者通常并不能显著提高准确性。对家族遗传研究的分析应考虑通过家族史方法与直接访谈获得的数据的不同质量。