• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对分裂情感性障碍、双相 I 型障碍、双相 II 型障碍、单相障碍及正常对照先证者的家系研究。

A family study of schizoaffective, bipolar I, bipolar II, unipolar, and normal control probands.

作者信息

Gershon E S, Hamovit J, Guroff J J, Dibble E, Leckman J F, Sceery W, Targum S D, Nurnberger J I, Goldin L R, Bunney W E

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Oct;39(10):1157-67. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100031006.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100031006
PMID:7125846
Abstract

In a family study of 1,254 adult relatives of patients and controls, lifetime prevalences of major affective disorder (including schizoaffective) were 37%, 24%, 25%, 20% and 7% in relatives of probands with schizoaffective, bipolar I, bipolar II, and unipolar disease, and normal controls. These data were compatible with the different affective disorders representing thresholds on a continuum of underlying multifactorial vulnerability. In this model, schizoaffective illness represents greatest vulnerability, followed by bipolar I and bipolar II, then unipolar illnesses. Alcoholism, drug abuse, and sociopathy were not more frequent in relatives of patients v relatives of controls. Sex-related transmission of morbid risk was not present. Morbid risk was 74% to offspring of two III parents, and 27% to offspring of one III parent. Nationality and age at time of interview seem to be nongenetic factors that affect frequency of diagnosis.

摘要

在一项针对1254名患者及对照的成年亲属的家族研究中,精神分裂情感障碍患者、I型双相情感障碍患者、II型双相情感障碍患者、单相情感障碍患者以及正常对照的亲属中,严重情感障碍(包括精神分裂情感障碍)的终生患病率分别为37%、24%、25%、20%和7%。这些数据与不同的情感障碍代表潜在多因素易感性连续体上的阈值这一观点相符。在该模型中,精神分裂情感障碍代表最大的易感性,其次是I型双相情感障碍和II型双相情感障碍,然后是单相情感障碍。患者亲属中酒精中毒、药物滥用和反社会人格障碍的发生率并不高于对照亲属。不存在与性别相关的发病风险传递。两个III级亲属的后代发病风险为74%,一个III级亲属的后代发病风险为27%。国籍和访谈时的年龄似乎是影响诊断频率的非遗传因素。

相似文献

1
A family study of schizoaffective, bipolar I, bipolar II, unipolar, and normal control probands.一项针对分裂情感性障碍、双相 I 型障碍、双相 II 型障碍、单相障碍及正常对照先证者的家系研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Oct;39(10):1157-67. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100031006.
2
Familial rates of affective disorder. A report from the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study.情感障碍的家族发病率。美国国立精神卫生研究所合作研究报告。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 May;44(5):461-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800170083011.
3
A family study of manic-depressive (bipolar I) disease. Is it a distinct illness separable from primary unipolar depression?一项关于躁郁症(双相I型)疾病的家族研究。它是一种可与原发性单相抑郁症区分开来的独特疾病吗?
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 May;52(5):367-73. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950170041006.
4
A controlled family study of chronic psychoses. Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.慢性精神病的对照家族研究。精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;45(4):328-36. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800280038006.
5
Schizoaffective illness, schizophrenia and affective disorders: morbidity risk and genetic transmission.分裂情感性障碍、精神分裂症及情感障碍:发病风险与遗传传递
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1982 Apr;65(4):253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1982.tb00845.x.
6
Familial rates of affective illness in Sardinia with special reference to schizoaffective disorder.撒丁岛情感性疾病的家族发病率,特别提及精神分裂症伴情感障碍。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1990;240(1):16-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02190087.
7
Continuity and discontinuity of affective disorders and schizophrenia. Results of a controlled family study.情感障碍与精神分裂症的连续性和非连续性:一项对照家庭研究的结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;50(11):871-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230041004.
8
The Roscommon Family Study. IV. Affective illness, anxiety disorders, and alcoholism in relatives.罗斯康芒家族研究。IV. 亲属中的情感性疾病、焦虑症和酗酒问题。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):952-60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240036005.
9
Schizoaffective disorder and affective disorders with mood-incongruent psychotic features: keep separate or combine? Evidence from a family study.精神分裂症伴情感障碍及具有心境不协调精神病性特征的情感障碍:分开还是合并?来自一项家系研究的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;149(12):1666-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1666.
10
The role of gender in understanding the familial transmission of schizoaffective disorder.性别在理解分裂情感性障碍家族遗传中的作用。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;163:763-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.6.763.

引用本文的文献

1
The genetics of severe depression.重度抑郁症的遗传学
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;30(3):1117-1126. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02731-1. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Examining the association of familial and social stress, trauma, and support on mood, anxiety, and behavioral symptoms and diagnoses in youth at risk for bipolar disorder and controls.探讨家族和社会压力、创伤和支持与双相情感障碍风险青年和对照组的情绪、焦虑和行为症状及诊断的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 15;363:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.125. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
The interplay of family history of depression and early trauma: associations with lifetime and current depression in the German national cohort (NAKO).
抑郁症家族史与早期创伤的相互作用:与德国全国队列研究(NAKO)中的终生及当前抑郁症的关联
Front Epidemiol. 2023 May 23;3:1099235. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1099235. eCollection 2023.
4
A characteristic cerebellar biosignature for bipolar disorder, identified with fully automatic machine learning.通过全自动机器学习识别出的双相情感障碍的一种特征性小脑生物特征。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;15:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.008. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Genomic SEM applied to explore etiological divergences in bipolar subtypes.基因组 SEM 应用于探索双相情感障碍亚型的病因差异。
Psychol Med. 2024 Apr;54(6):1152-1159. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002957. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
The Nature of the Familial Risk for Psychosis in Bipolar Disorder.双相障碍精神病家族风险的本质。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):157-165. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad097.
7
Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample.双相情感障碍维度模型与分类模型在一个家系样本中的强大基因重叠。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 26:2023.06.24.23291169. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.24.23291169.
8
Clinical research diagnostic criteria for bipolar illness (CRDC-BP): rationale and validity.双相情感障碍的临床研究诊断标准(CRDC-BP):基本原理与效度
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2022 Oct 13;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40345-022-00267-3.
9
The positive impact of maternal depression intervention on children's emotional and behavioral symptoms in a low-resource setting.在资源匮乏环境下,母亲抑郁干预对儿童情绪和行为症状的积极影响。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;44(6):590-601. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2022-2498.
10
MicroRNA Alterations in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neurons from Bipolar Disorder Patients: Pathways Involved in Neuronal Differentiation, Axon Guidance, and Plasticity.双相障碍患者诱导多能干细胞衍生神经元中的 microRNA 改变:涉及神经元分化、轴突导向和可塑性的途径。
Stem Cells Dev. 2020 Sep 1;29(17):1145-1159. doi: 10.1089/scd.2020.0046. Epub 2020 Jun 17.