• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越非机构化:一部不断演变的承诺法。

Beyond deinstitutionalization: a commitment law in evolution.

作者信息

Durham M L, Pierce G L

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;33(3):216-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.3.216.

DOI:10.1176/ps.33.3.216
PMID:7061058
Abstract

In 1973 Washington State changed its civil commitment law to more rigorously control the number of involuntary commitments in a move consistent with the national trend toward deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill and the development of community treatment alternatives. In 1979, after six years of working within narrowly drawn criteria for commitment, the state strengthened its civil commitment authority through revisions that included expanding the definition of "gravely disabled", adding destruction of property to the "likelihood of serious harm" clause, making the provisions for revoking conditional releases more stringent, and allowing spouses of mentally ill individuals to testify against them during commitment proceedings. Early figures show that involuntary commitments, while trying to cope with federal cutbacks and diminishing resources.

摘要

1973年,华盛顿州修改了其民事收容法,以更严格地控制非自愿收容的人数,这一举措与全国将精神病患者非机构化以及发展社区治疗替代方案的趋势相一致。1979年,在依据狭义的收容标准工作了六年之后,该州通过修订加强了其民事收容权力,修订内容包括扩大“严重残疾”的定义,在“严重伤害可能性”条款中增加财产破坏行为,使撤销有条件释放的规定更加严格,并允许精神病患者的配偶在收容程序中出庭指证他们。早期数据显示,非自愿收容情况……同时还在努力应对联邦政府的削减和资源减少的问题。 (注:原文最后“while trying to cope with federal cutbacks and diminishing resources.”后面似乎内容不完整)

相似文献

1
Beyond deinstitutionalization: a commitment law in evolution.超越非机构化:一部不断演变的承诺法。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;33(3):216-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.3.216.
2
Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.与民事拘押法规相关的35年工作经历。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(4):430-9.
3
Decision makers in law and psychiatry and the involuntary civil commitment process.法律和精神病学领域的决策者以及非自愿民事住院程序。
Community Ment Health J. 1981 Summer;17(2):114-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00754357.
4
Conservatorship for the "gravely disabled": California's nondeclaration of nonindependence.对“严重残疾者”的监护:加利福尼亚州未宣布的不独立状态
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1978;1(4):395-426.
5
Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment.民事拘禁令中的刑事司法程序。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1977 Nov;28(11):817-26. doi: 10.1176/ps.28.11.817.
6
Dangerousness: legal determinations and clinical speculations.危险性:法律判定与临床推测
Psychiatr Q. 1980 Summer;52(2):108-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01071881.
7
Short-term civil commitment and the violent patient.短期民事收容与暴力患者
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;139(9):1145-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1145.
8
The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.明显需要治疗的患病患者:民事收容的第四条标准。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;36(3):259-64. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.3.259.
9
The impact of broadened civil commitment standards on admissions to state mental hospitals.放宽民事收容标准对州立精神病院收容情况的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;142(1):104-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.1.104.
10
The context of involuntary commitment on the basis of danger to others: a study of the use of the California 14-day certificate.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982 Oct;170(10):622-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198210000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond criminalization: toward a criminologically informed framework for mental health policy and services research.超越刑事定罪:迈向一个具有犯罪学依据的心理健康政策与服务研究框架。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Sep;33(5):544-57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0072-0.
2
Civil commitment reform: context and consequences.民事收容改革:背景与后果
Psychiatr Q. 1985 Fall-Winter;57(3-4):217-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01277616.