Brooks D L, Dietrich M C
J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Apr;80(4):355-60.
Recent events mandate that internship faculties review their selection criteria and processes carefully. These events include legal decisions and the implementation of federal regulations, as well as the dietetic traineeship "phase-out" and ADA's decision to rescind application restrictions. This study profiles the 1978 selection criteria and processes used by 47 of the 68 accredited dietetic internship programs. The most common criteria included (in decreasing order of importance): academic records, letters of recommendation, applicant essays, and demographic/biographic data. Standardized tests and applicant interviews were used infrequently. The reliability and validity of certain selection criteria, e.g., letters of recommendation, are questioned. Recommendation for increasing the predictive quality of the letters and other selection tools are included. Criteria of questionable legality should be reviewed and clarified or eliminated from selection processes. Finally, internship directors are encouraged to evaluate their selection processes to assure objectivity and sensitivity. The authors found that the selection criteria used by internship programs corresponded to those used by most academic and allied health professions to predict success in the programs. Although intended for internship faculties, the recommendations may be useful to coordinated undergraduate dietetics programs as they define their selection criteria.
近期发生的一些事件要求实习指导教师认真审查他们的选拔标准和流程。这些事件包括法律判决、联邦法规的实施,以及营养实习项目的“逐步淘汰”和美国饮食协会撤销申请限制的决定。本研究概述了68个获得认证的营养实习项目中47个项目在1978年使用的选拔标准和流程。最常见的标准包括(按重要性降序排列):学术记录、推荐信、申请人论文以及人口统计学/个人传记数据。标准化考试和申请人面试很少使用。某些选拔标准的可靠性和有效性,例如推荐信,受到质疑。文中包括了提高推荐信和其他选拔工具预测质量的建议。应审查那些合法性存疑的标准,并在选拔过程中予以澄清或消除。最后,鼓励实习项目主任评估他们的选拔流程,以确保其客观性和敏感性。作者发现,实习项目使用的选拔标准与大多数学术和相关健康专业用于预测项目成功的标准一致。尽管这些建议是针对实习指导教师的,但在协调本科营养项目确定其选拔标准时可能会有用。