The risk of death from combined abortion-sterilization procedures: can hysterotomy or hysterectomy be justified?

Clinicians have debated whether women who request permanent sterilization when they undergo elective abortion should have the two operations done concurrently. Moreover, if the procedures are performed concurrently, the appropriate surgical approach is unknown. To evaluate the latter issue, we identified all concurrent abortion-sterilization deaths in the United States in the period 1972 to 1978 from the Centers for Disease Control's nationwide surveillance of abortion mortality and divided them into two groups: those who had hysterotomy with tubal ligation or hysterectomy (H/H) and those who had curettage or instillation procedures, with tubal ligation by laparoscopy or laparotomy (other procedures). We then used data from the Joint Program for the Study of Abortion (JPSA/CDC) to estimate the number of procedures done in the United States in the period 1972 to 1978 and calculated death-to-case rates for each group. We found that the risk of dying from a concurrent abortion-sterilization procedure was 3.3 times higher if done by H/H. The relative risk for this group was highest during the first 12 weeks of gestation (4.6) and lowest at 13 weeks or later (1.3), regardless of the presence or absence of preexisting medical conditions. Except in the rare instances where the woman has an indication for hysterectomy other than fertility control, the performance of hysterectomy or hysterectomy for concurrent abortion-sterilization, particularly at less than 13 weeks' gestation, does not appear justified.