• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The breech head and its ultrasound significance.

作者信息

Kasby C B, Poll V

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;89(2):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04674.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04674.x
PMID:7066241
Abstract

Breech babies were shown to have a smaller mean biparietal diameter (BPD) neonatally compared with that of a matched group of vertex babies. This was due to a mild skull deformation which occurred in at least one-third of 100 consecutive term breech babies examined. Features of this skull deformation (dolichocephaly, a prominent occiput with a suboccipital shelf, an elongated face and a parallel-sided head) constitute the 'breech head'. The caliper-determined occipitofrontal/biparietal diameter ratio (OFD/BPD) in these newborn infants was consistently above 1 . 30. This ratio, when calculated from sonar examination in the third trimester, was also found to correlate well with the 'breech head' shape. The identification by ultrasound of these babies should prevent the misdiagnosis of fetal growth retardation based on serial BPD measurements alone.

摘要

相似文献

1
The breech head and its ultrasound significance.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;89(2):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04674.x.
2
[Accuracy of ultrasound weight assessment--comparison of vertex vs. breech presentation].[超声体重评估的准确性——头先露与臀先露的比较]
Ultraschall Med. 1997 Feb;18(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000510.
3
The 'breech head' and its relevance.“臀先露头部”及其相关性。
Am J Dis Child. 1979 Feb;133(2):154-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1979.02130020044009.
4
Growth in breech presentation. Ultrasound and post-partal assessment of growth in 225 fetuses presenting by the breech in the 33rd gestational week.臀位胎儿的生长情况。对225例孕33周臀位胎儿的生长情况进行超声及产后评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(2):157-60. doi: 10.3109/00016348609158372.
5
Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses.臀位胎儿头部超声生物测量参数(头围——HC,双顶径——BPD)的差异。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2007 Dec;151(2):323-6. doi: 10.5507/bp.2007.055.
6
Alterations in head shape of newborn infants after caesarean section or vaginal delivery.剖宫产或阴道分娩后新生儿头部形状的改变。
Arch Dis Child. 1976 Aug;51(8):624-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.51.8.624.
7
[The value of prepartal ultrasound estimation of birth weight in breech presentation].[产前超声估计臀先露胎儿出生体重的价值]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992 May;52(5):264-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023746.
8
Significance of ultrasound measurements of the head of the breech fetus.
J Ultrasound Med. 1987 Aug;6(8):437-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.1987.6.8.437.
9
Ultrasound diagnosis of the hyperextended head in breech presentation.臀先露时头部过度伸展的超声诊断
J Clin Ultrasound. 1977 Aug;5(4):278-81. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870050415.
10
'Breech head' with brow presentation.“胎头呈额先露的臀先露” 。
Am J Dis Child. 1980 Oct;134(10):994. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130220070023.

引用本文的文献

1
The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy-Comparison of the First and Second Twins.超声估计胎儿体重的准确性及双胎妊娠小于胎龄儿的预测——第一胎儿与第二胎儿的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 May 6;12(9):3307. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093307.
2
Expanding the clinical phenotype of internal tandem duplication.内部串联重复的临床表型扩展。
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2022 Mar 24;8(2). doi: 10.1101/mcs.a006174. Print 2022 Feb.
3
Antenatal Ultrasound Imaging for Analysis of Human Craniosynostosis.
产前超声成像在分析颅缝早闭中的应用。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2403:295-310. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1847-9_20.
4
Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.双绒毛膜双胎的生长轨迹:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):221.e1-221.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.044. Epub 2016 Apr 30.