Zeiler M D, Solano J M
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):223-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-223.
Pigeons produced a stimulus change either by responding or by not responding for a specified time period (by pausing). They then had to choose between two responses to obtain food. One choice was correct if the first component had been completed by a response; the other was correct if the component had been completed by a pause. The pigeons usually chose correctly, thereby indicating that they used their own prior behavior as a discriminative stimulus. Fixed pause requirements did not produce equal first component completions by a response and by a pause. To obtain equality, the pause requirement was titrated as a function of current performance. Titration resulted in equal completions and also produced accurate discrimination. In addition to showing that pigeons discriminated whether they had responded or paused, the data displayed and discontinuous functions predicted by catastrophe theory. Another procedure used forced choice rather than titration to produce equal completions by pausing and responding and also showed accurate discrimination of behavior.
鸽子通过做出反应或在特定时间段内不做出反应(即暂停)来产生刺激变化。然后,它们必须在两种反应之间做出选择以获取食物。如果第一个部分是通过反应完成的,那么一种选择是正确的;如果该部分是通过暂停完成的,那么另一种选择是正确的。鸽子通常做出正确的选择,从而表明它们将自己先前的行为用作辨别性刺激。固定的暂停要求并不会使反应和暂停导致第一个部分的完成情况相等。为了实现相等,根据当前表现对暂停要求进行调整。调整导致了相等的完成情况,并且也产生了准确的辨别。除了表明鸽子能够辨别自己是做出了反应还是暂停了之外,数据还显示了突变理论所预测的不连续函数。另一种程序使用强制选择而非调整来使暂停和反应导致相等的完成情况,并且也显示了对行为的准确辨别。