Turner E, Kentor P, Melamed J L, Rao G, Zeitz H J
Radiology. 1982 May;143(2):327-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071333.
One hundred randomly selected patients undergoing routine excretory urography were assigned in double-blind fashion by alternate entry pairs to receive radiographic contrast media at 37 degrees C (Group I) or room temperature (Group II). There were three anaphylactoid reactions and five nonanaphylactoid reactions in Group I, and five anaphylactoid and eight nonanaphylactoid reactions in Group II, differences that were not statistically significant. No differences were detected between reactors and nonreactors. Thus, in this study, infusion temperature had no effect on the frequency of adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media during excretory urography.
一百名随机挑选的接受常规排泄性尿路造影的患者，通过交替配对的双盲方式被分配，分别接受37摄氏度的造影剂（第一组）或室温造影剂（第二组）。第一组有3例类过敏反应和5例非类过敏反应，第二组有5例类过敏反应和8例非类过敏反应，这些差异无统计学意义。在有反应者和无反应者之间未检测到差异。因此，在本研究中，输注温度对排泄性尿路造影期间造影剂不良反应的发生率没有影响。
