Strasberg B, Lam W, Swiryn S, Bauernfeind R, Scagliotti D, Palileo E, Rosen K
Am Heart J. 1982 May;103(5):795-801. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90391-x.
Two apparently healthy patients had recurrent syncope with documented paroxysmal AV block. In both patients the site of AV block was demonstrated to be in the AV node. Coronary angiography (in both patients) and sustained deep inspiration (one patient) reproducibly initiated episodes of paroxysmal AV nodal block (identical to spontaneous episodes). Atropine abolished further attempts of AV block induction. Vagal hyperresponsiveness was limited to the AV node, since the interventions provoking paroxysmal AV nodal block produced only appropriate sinus slowing. This syndrome reflects hyperresponsiveness of the AV node to vagotonic reflexes, and exists as a clinically significant entity producing recurrent syncope.
两名看似健康的患者反复出现晕厥,并有阵发性房室传导阻滞的记录。在这两名患者中,房室传导阻滞的部位均显示在房室结。冠状动脉造影(两名患者均进行)和持续深吸气(一名患者)可重复性地引发阵发性房室结阻滞发作(与自发发作相同)。阿托品可消除进一步诱发房室传导阻滞的尝试。迷走神经高反应性仅限于房室结,因为诱发阵发性房室结阻滞的干预措施仅产生适当的窦性心动过缓。这种综合征反映了房室结对迷走反射的高反应性,是一种导致反复晕厥的具有临床意义的实体。