Chandler J G
Ann Surg. 1982 May;195(5):543-53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198205000-00003.
To analyze the relationship between the splanchnic and systemic effects of vasopressin and to measure its efficacy in lowering portal pressure relative to what can be accomplished by zero gradient shunting, intraoperative measurements of cardiac output and relevant pressures were made in 30 patients undergoing selective or total shunts. Vasopressin caused a significant increase in systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, but an insignificant overall reduction in cardiac index (CI). However, in ten patients the decrease in CI exceeded 20%, suggesting a subpopulation of especially susceptible individuals. High initial CI, age, pre-existent heart disease, and severity of cirrhosis did not predict greater vulnerability. Adding an infusion of nitroprusside regularly reverted CI to control levels, regardless of the extent of cardiac output depression. Vasopressin was 38% as effective as a subsequent shunt in reducing splanchnic venous pressure. The portal hypotensive action bore no relationship to CI, but the pressure decrease caused by vasopressin was predictive of the reduction that could be achieved by shunting. The effects of the two types of shunts on systemic hemodynamics were minor and remarkably similar.
为分析血管加压素的内脏效应与全身效应之间的关系,并衡量其降低门静脉压力的效果(相对于零梯度分流所能达到的效果),对30例行选择性或全分流术的患者术中测量心输出量及相关压力。血管加压素使全身血管阻力和肺毛细血管楔压显著升高,但心指数(CI)总体降低不显著。然而,10例患者的心指数下降超过20%,提示存在一个特别易感的亚组人群。高初始心指数、年龄、既往心脏病史及肝硬化严重程度均不能预测更高的易感性。定期输注硝普钠可使心指数恢复至对照水平,而不论心输出量降低的程度如何。血管加压素在降低内脏静脉压力方面的效果相当于随后分流术的38%。门静脉降压作用与心指数无关,但血管加压素引起的压力降低可预测分流术所能实现的压力降低。两种类型的分流术对全身血流动力学的影响较小且非常相似。