Sugimachi K, Ikeda M, Ueo H, Kai H, Okudaira Y, Inokuchi K
Ann Thorac Surg. 1982 Apr;33(4):374-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63231-6.
We have clinically evaluated Russian and American stapling devices used for esophageal reconstruction and compared the results following stapled anastomosis with those following hand-sutured procedures, both performed by the same surgeon. With the Russian stapler, anastomoses performed in 17 patients with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus resulted in only one (5.9%) anastomotic leak; in 12 hand-sutured anastomoses and in 11 anastomoses done with an American stapler, no anastomotic complication occurred. Thus, a long gastric tube with good blood supply is of paramount importance, and if the technical details of surgical stapling can be overcome, a stapled anastomosis appears to be as safe as a manual suturing for patients undergoing esophageal reconstruction.
我们对用于食管重建的俄罗斯和美国吻合器进行了临床评估,并比较了由同一位外科医生进行的吻合器吻合与手工缝合术后的结果。使用俄罗斯吻合器,对17例胸段食管癌患者进行吻合,仅1例(5.9%)出现吻合口漏;在12例手工缝合吻合和11例使用美国吻合器的吻合中,未发生吻合口并发症。因此,血供良好的长胃管至关重要,如果能克服手术吻合器的技术细节问题,对于接受食管重建的患者而言,吻合器吻合似乎与手工缝合一样安全。