Reinking R H, Livesay G, Kohl M
Am J Community Psychol. 1978 Jun;6(3):283-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00894358.
This study examined the effectiveness of three different consultation styles adapted from Bindman's typology. Consultees were nurses on eight wards in a state hospital for the retarded, who were assigned to Expert, Resource, and Process consultation groups plus a no-treatment control. Data on the number of new programs independently initiated by consultees were collected during a 6-week base line, 12-week consultation, and 6-week follow-up period. Results showed a general increase in number of programs initiated during the second half of the consultation period, with trends established there continued through the follow-up. Degree of change was directly related to the style of consultation: the Expert role proved no better than the control condition; the Resource and Process roles generated significant consultee activity, with the Process model generating the most programs in both experimental and follow-up periods.
本研究考察了源自宾德曼类型学的三种不同咨询方式的有效性。被咨询者是一家智障人士州立医院八个病房的护士,她们被分配到专家咨询组、资源咨询组、过程咨询组以及一个无治疗对照组。在为期6周的基线期、12周的咨询期和6周的随访期内,收集了被咨询者独立发起的新项目数量的数据。结果显示,在咨询期后半段发起的项目数量总体有所增加,且在随访期内持续了这一趋势。变化程度与咨询方式直接相关:专家角色并不比对照组更有效;资源和过程角色产生了显著的被咨询者活动,过程模式在实验期和随访期都产生了最多的项目。