Morse E E, Viswanathan U
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1978 Sep-Oct;8(5):438-41.
This paper compares two specific, rapid, functional methods for the measurement of fibrinogen. Both methods demonstrate a high degree of reproduceability (thrombin clotting time CV = 3.7 percent, clot density rate CV = 7.6 percent). Measurement of plasmas from 20 patients by both techniques showed excellent correlation between the two methods with a correlation coefficient of 0.93 by least squares method. The initial dilution step in the thrombin clotting time method bypasses interference by small amounts of heparin or other inhibitors in jaundiced samples which may present a problem in the measurement of the rate of density development in the clot density method.
本文比较了两种用于测量纤维蛋白原的特定、快速的功能方法。两种方法均显示出高度的可重复性(凝血酶凝血时间CV = 3.7%,凝块密度率CV = 7.6%)。用这两种技术对20例患者的血浆进行测量,结果显示两种方法之间具有极佳的相关性,最小二乘法得出的相关系数为0.93。凝血酶凝血时间法中的初始稀释步骤可避免黄疸样本中少量肝素或其他抑制剂的干扰,而这些干扰在凝块密度法中测量密度发展速率时可能会成为问题。