Brodie D C
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1982 Apr;39(4):587-94.
Several contemporary issues in pharmaceutical education in the United States are explored. Topics discussed include evolutionary growth and reform in pharmaceutical education, distinction among pharmacists related to practice site, the effects of a pluralistic health-care system on pharmaceutical education, the need for a contemporary philosophy of pharmaceutical education, the place for "training" in pharmaceutical education, and relationships between AACP and ASHP. In the 1980s, pharmaceutical education has three goals to accomplish. First, the relationship between academicians and practitioners must be improved. Second, an active program of recruitment for undergraduate and graduate students needs to be established. Finally, an agreement must be reached on a one- or two-tier structure for education. The author advocates the one-tier (single-entry-degree) system of pharmaceutical education, and he argues that pharmacy will become seriously divided if it does not commit itself to this course.
探讨了美国药学教育中的几个当代问题。讨论的主题包括药学教育的发展演变与改革、与执业地点相关的药师之间的区别、多元化医疗保健系统对药学教育的影响、当代药学教育理念的必要性、药学教育中“培训”的地位以及美国药学院协会(AACP)与美国医院药师协会(ASHP)之间的关系。在20世纪80年代,药学教育有三个目标要实现。首先,必须改善学者与从业者之间的关系。其次,需要建立一个积极的本科生和研究生招生计划。最后,必须就教育的单层或双层结构达成一致。作者主张药学教育的单层(单一入学学位)体系,他认为,如果药学不致力于此,将会严重分化。