Gillingham K K, Makalous D L, Tays M A
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982 Apr;53(4):336-41.
Gz loads in A-10 aircraft were recorded on nine sorties during JAWS II exercises, and the pilots completed questionnaires on the effects of G stress in the A-10. Analysis of the recordings provided, among other statistics, the following means: maneuvering time, 28 min; peak +Gz load, +6.2; peak -Gz load, -0.1; G-time integral above 4 G, 85 G.s; G onsets greater than or equal to 6 G/s, 13. The questionnaires and follow-up interviews generated little evidence of G intolerance; the pilots did report significant task saturation, however. To compare the physiologic effects of G stress in the A-10 with those of G stress in the F-4, eight volunteer subjects were exposed to simulated A-10 and F-4 missions on the USAFSAM centrifuge. Although the two G-stress profiles were equally difficult and fatiguing, the subjects experienced less visual loss and had lower maximum heart rates during the A-10 profile.
在“大白鲨二号”演习期间，A - 10飞机上的过载负荷在九次飞行任务中被记录下来，飞行员完成了关于A - 10飞机上重力应激影响的问卷调查。对记录的分析除其他统计数据外，还得出以下平均值：机动时间28分钟；峰值+Gz负荷，+6.2；峰值 -Gz负荷，-0.1；4G以上的G时间积分，85G·秒；大于或等于6G/秒的G起始次数，13次。问卷调查和后续访谈几乎没有发现重力不耐受的证据；然而，飞行员确实报告了严重的任务饱和情况。为了比较A - 10飞机上重力应激与F - 4飞机上重力应激的生理影响，八名志愿者在空军航天医学学校的离心机上接受了模拟A - 10和F - 4任务。尽管两种重力应激模式同样困难且令人疲劳，但受试者在A - 10模式下视觉丧失较少，最大心率也较低。
