Sinclair S W, Davies D M, Bracka A
Br J Plast Surg. 1982 Apr;35(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(82)90146-1.
A panel of three has reviewed a series of 100 videotape records of nasopharyngoscopy, basal fluorography and lateral fluorography made of patients being investigated for velopharyngeal incompetence. The quality of each record was assessed and estimates of movement made as a basis for comparison of the three methods. Nasopharyngoscopy and lateral fluorography provide a high proportion of material with good definition of the velopharyngeal isthmus (80%). Basal fluorography is less reliable (60%). Lateral fluorography was found to be unreliable as a measure of velopharyngeal incompetence, while estimates of movement from the other two were compatible. Basal fluorography is the procedure of choice in young children. Nasendoscopy provides good quality information more often than basal fluorography in patients over the age of eight and is markedly superior in the presence of a pharyngeal flap.
一个由三人组成的小组审查了一系列100份录像记录，这些记录来自因腭咽功能不全而接受检查的患者的鼻咽喉镜检查、基础荧光造影和侧位荧光造影。对每份记录的质量进行了评估，并对运动进行了估计，以此作为三种方法比较的基础。鼻咽喉镜检查和侧位荧光造影能提供高比例的材料，对腭咽峡的定义清晰（80%）。基础荧光造影的可靠性较低（60%）。发现侧位荧光造影作为腭咽功能不全的一种测量方法不可靠，而另外两种方法对运动的估计是一致的。基础荧光造影是幼儿的首选检查方法。在8岁以上的患者中，鼻内镜检查比基础荧光造影更常提供高质量的信息，并且在存在咽瓣的情况下明显更具优势。
