• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一项针对老年人的干预计划。

Evaluating an intervention program for the elderly.

作者信息

Rosen C E, Rosen S

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 1982 Spring;18(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00757109.

DOI:10.1007/BF00757109
PMID:7083809
Abstract

The effectiveness of mental health group experiences on senior citizen center participants needing such services was assessed through a quasi-experiment involving 68 MH group participants and 31 comparison cases judged not in need to MH services. The evidence indicated substantial increases in social and nonsocial activity, morale, and self-satisfaction. Senior center personnel provided corroborative observations. The changes were such that by the conclusion of the group sessions the "experimentals" had come to function at a level that was indistinguishable from their comparison group. By contrast, 18 elderly needing such mental health services, but attending senior centers where services were unavailable, showed no improvement or declined over time

摘要

通过一项准实验评估了心理健康小组体验对需要此类服务的老年中心参与者的有效性,该实验涉及68名心理健康小组参与者和31名被判定不需要心理健康服务的对照案例。证据表明,社交和非社交活动、士气和自我满意度都有显著提高。老年中心工作人员提供了佐证观察结果。这些变化使得在小组会议结束时,“实验组”的功能水平与对照组难以区分。相比之下,18名需要此类心理健康服务但在没有服务的老年中心就诊的老年人没有改善或随时间下降。

相似文献

1
Evaluating an intervention program for the elderly.评估一项针对老年人的干预计划。
Community Ment Health J. 1982 Spring;18(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00757109.
2
Evaluation of psychodynamic psychotherapy in a community mental health center.社区心理健康中心心理动力心理治疗的评估
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2009 Winter;37(4):665-81. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2009.37.4.665.
3
[Psychiatry in the urban sector--results of an empirical study and experiences at the counseling center for social and psychiatric problems in Linden (Hannover)].[城市地区的精神病学——林登(汉诺威)社会与精神问题咨询中心的实证研究结果与经验]
Psychiatr Prax. 1983 Jan;10(1):8-14.
4
The effects of a pretreatment educational group programme on mental health treatment outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.一项预处理教育小组计划对心理健康治疗结果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3466-2.
5
Mental health and aging initiative: intervention component effects.心理健康与老龄化倡议:干预组成部分的效果
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2154. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
6
Community Mental Health Center Integrated Care Outcomes.社区心理健康中心综合护理成果。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Dec;89(4):969-982. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9594-3.
7
Profiles and service utilization for children accessing a mental health walk-in clinic versus usual care.进入心理健康即时诊疗诊所的儿童与接受常规护理的儿童的概况及服务利用情况。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(4):338-52. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2012.663676.
8
User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.用户参与社区心理健康服务:探索用户与专业人员的体验
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00660.x. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
9
Adolescent treatment outcome in a community mental health center.
Community Ment Health J. 2003 Feb;39(1):47-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1021273823750.
10
Challenges to Effective Primary Care-Specialty Communication and Coordination in the Mental Health Referral and Care Process for Publicly Insured Children.公共保险儿童心理健康转诊与护理过程中有效初级保健与专科沟通及协调面临的挑战。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;45(4):668-677. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9585-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for loneliness in older adults: a systematic review of reviews.老年人孤独干预措施的系统评价综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1427605. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1427605. eCollection 2024.
2
Interventions to Reduce Loneliness in Community-Living Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施对减少社区居住的老年人孤独感的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):1015-1028. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08517-5. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Social Prescription Interventions Addressing Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Meta-Review Integrating On-the-Ground Resources.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines to treatment approaches. Modalities and methods for use with the aged.
Gerontologist. 1973 Winter;13(4):513-27. doi: 10.1093/geront/13.4.513.
2
Evaluation of the quality of psychiatric care for the aged.老年精神病护理质量评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):315-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.3.315.
社会处方干预措施解决老年人的社会隔离和孤独问题:整合实地资源的元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 17;25:e40213. doi: 10.2196/40213.
4
Conditions for Feasibility of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Social Isolation and Loneliness in Noninstitutionalized Older Adults.针对非机构化老年人减少社会隔离和孤独感的多成分干预措施的可行性条件
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;10(6):1104. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061104.
5
Relationships of self-management abilities to loneliness among older people: a cross-sectional study.老年人自我管理能力与孤独感的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 27;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01584-x.
6
Social isolation in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人的社会隔离:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(5):1-49. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review.针对老年人社交孤立的干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.
8
A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness.孤独感干预措施的荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66. doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394. Epub 2010 Aug 17.