• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人对单个单词和概念相关的三元词组的自由联想。

Free associations of older adults to single words and conceptually related word triads.

作者信息

Lovelace E A, Cooley S

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1982 Jul;37(4):432-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.4.432.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/37.4.432
PMID:7086079
Abstract

Verbal free association responses were elicited to 56 single-word stimuli and 30 triads of conceptually related words from 95 older adults (52 to 90 years) and 31 younger adults (23 to 49). For single words, the distribution of paradigmatic and syntagmatic associations was similar for the older and younger samples; multiple regression analysis indicated that, although vocabulary scores were a good predictor of type of response, age was not. Specific responses to single words were similar for older and younger adults; there was some evidence of a slight reduction in commonality of associations with aging. For triad stimuli, the levels of responses reflecting shared membership in a natural category or a shared characteristic (sensory) feature were similar for younger and older adults; again vocabulary scores consistently predicted such responses, but age did not.

摘要

对95名老年人(52至90岁)和31名年轻人(23至49岁)进行了言语自由联想反应测试,测试内容包括56个单字刺激和30组概念相关的单词三元组。对于单字,老年人和年轻人样本的范例性联想和组合性联想分布相似;多元回归分析表明,虽然词汇分数是反应类型的良好预测指标,但年龄不是。老年人和年轻人对单字的具体反应相似;有证据表明,随着年龄增长,联想的共同性略有下降。对于三元组刺激,反映自然类别中的共享成员或共享特征(感官)特征的反应水平在年轻人和老年人中相似;同样,词汇分数始终可以预测此类反应,但年龄不能。

相似文献

1
Free associations of older adults to single words and conceptually related word triads.老年人对单个单词和概念相关的三元词组的自由联想。
J Gerontol. 1982 Jul;37(4):432-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.4.432.
2
Word associations in old age: evidence for consistency in semantic encoding during adulthood.老年人的词汇联想:成年期语义编码一致性的证据。
Psychol Aging. 1986 Dec;1(4):283-92. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.1.4.283.
3
Paradigmatic associations and individual variability in early lexical-semantic networks: Evidence from a free association task.早期词汇语义网络中的范式关联和个体变异性:来自自由联想任务的证据。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jan;56(1):53-69. doi: 10.1037/dev0000844. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Performance of younger and older adults on tests of word knowledge and word retrieval: independence or interdependence of skills?年轻人和老年人在词汇知识和词汇提取测试上的表现:技能是独立还是相互依赖?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;23(1):36-45. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0136).
5
The role of vocabulary ability during visual word recognition in younger and older adults.词汇能力在年轻人和老年人视觉单词识别过程中的作用。
J Gen Psychol. 1999 Jan;126(1):6-16. doi: 10.1080/00221309909595348.
6
Age differences in the commonality of free associations.自由联想共性中的年龄差异。
Exp Aging Res. 1986 Summer;12(2):95-8. doi: 10.1080/03610738608259443.
7
Aging-related gains and losses associated with word production in connected speech.与连贯言语中单词生成相关的衰老相关得失。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016 Nov;23(6):638-50. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1158233. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift and reading development.组合关系与聚合关系的转换及阅读发展
J Child Lang. 2002 Feb;29(1):189-204.
9
Free associations and dominance ratings of homophones for young and older adults.年轻人和老年人对同音词的自由联想及优势评级
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):408-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03195589.
10
Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.编码难度、词频和语音规律性对单词命名年龄差异的影响。
Exp Aging Res. 2011 May;37(3):261-92. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.568805.

引用本文的文献

1
Adults with Poor Reading Skills, Older Adults, and College Students: the Meanings They Understand During Reading Using a Diffusion Model Analysis.阅读技能较差的成年人、老年人和大学生:使用扩散模型分析他们在阅读过程中理解的含义。
J Mem Lang. 2018 Oct;102:115-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
2
Age-Related Degree and Criteria Differences in Semantic Categorization.语义分类中与年龄相关的程度和标准差异。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.74.
3
A "concrete view" of aging: event related potentials reveal age-related changes in basic integrative processes in language.
一种“具体的”衰老观:事件相关电位揭示了语言基本综合过程中的年龄相关变化。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.018. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
4
Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.年龄相关和个体差异在语言理解中的预测使用。
Brain Lang. 2010 Dec;115(3):149-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
5
Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.前瞻性思考:预测在语言理解中的作用与根源
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):491-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x. Epub 2007 May 22.
6
Memory, language, and ageing.记忆、语言与衰老。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Dec 29;352(1363):1845-56. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0170.
7
Knowing but not remembering: adult age differences in recollective experience.知晓却不记得:成年人在回忆体验方面的年龄差异。
Mem Cognit. 1993 May;21(3):379-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03208271.
8
Memory for scripts in young and older adults.
Mem Cognit. 1983 Sep;11(5):435-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03196980.