Newton L H
J Med Philos. 1982 Feb;7(1):11-21. doi: 10.1093/jmp/7.1.11.
Traditional medical ethics, developed to apply to the contingencies of individual fee-for-service medical practice, do not always seem to speak to the problems of the new forms and locations of health care: the medical team, the hospital, the organized health-care profession, and the society as a whole as guarantor of all health care and education. It is the purpose of this issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy to articulate guidelines for describing and attributing responsibility for health care in these collective providers. This introduction attempts to provide the conceptual apparatus for a discussion of collective responsibility in health care, by the elucidation of the multiple meanings of "responsibility" and the articulation of three standard models for collective responsibility. In the light of these models, the question is put: can the health-care professions and their various subunits and institutions accept and exercise moral responsibility for health care? Its importance is stressed, and its answer left to the contributors.
传统医学伦理是为适用于个体按服务收费的医疗实践中的各种情况而发展起来的,对于医疗保健的新形式和新场所所产生的问题,似乎并不总能给出答案:比如医疗团队、医院、有组织的医疗保健行业,以及作为所有医疗保健和教育保障者的整个社会。本期《医学与哲学杂志》的目的是阐明一些指导方针,用于描述这些集体医疗服务提供者的医疗保健责任并确定责任归属。本引言试图通过阐明“责任”的多种含义并阐述集体责任的三种标准模式,为讨论医疗保健中的集体责任提供概念框架。根据这些模式,提出了这样一个问题:医疗保健行业及其各个子部门和机构能否承担并履行医疗保健的道德责任?强调了该问题的重要性,并将答案留给各位撰稿人。