Rovin S, Nash J
Am J Public Health. 1982 Jul;72(7):656-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.7.656.
The traditional and predominant manner of delivering dental care is through a fee-for-service, private practice system. A number of alternative dental care delivery systems have emerged and are being tested, and others are just emerging. These systems include department store practices, hospital dental services, health maintenance organizations, the independent practice of dental hygiene, and denturism. Although it is too soon to draw final conclusions about the efficacy and effectiveness of these systems, we examine them for their potential to compete with and change the way dental care is currently delivered. Using the parameters of cost, accessibility, and quality, we compare these systems to traditional dental practice. Some of these emerging forms clearly have the potential to complete favorably with traditional practice. Other seem less likely to alter the existing system substantially. The system which can best control costs, increase accessibility, and enhance quality will gain the competitive edge.
提供牙科护理的传统且占主导地位的方式是通过按服务收费的私人执业体系。一些替代性的牙科护理提供体系已经出现并正在接受检验,还有一些则刚刚兴起。这些体系包括百货商店式诊所、医院牙科服务、健康维护组织、牙科保健员独立执业以及假牙修复行业。尽管现在就对这些体系的功效和有效性得出最终结论还为时过早,但我们审视它们与当前牙科护理提供方式竞争并改变其方式的潜力。我们使用成本、可及性和质量等参数,将这些体系与传统牙科执业进行比较。其中一些新兴形式显然有潜力与传统执业进行有利竞争。其他一些似乎不太可能对现有体系产生实质性改变。能够最佳地控制成本、提高可及性并提升质量的体系将获得竞争优势。