Ryan W, Gates G A, Cantu E, Hearne E M
Am J Otolaryngol. 1982 Mar-Apr;3(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(82)80038-0.
To assess those aspects of esophageal speech that contribute to effective communication, a series of measures were applied to the esophageal speech of a prospectively studied group of recent laryngectomees (n = 20) six months following completion of their cancer therapy and to that of a second group (n = 27) studied retrospectively 6.6 years postoperatively. Ages of the two groups did not differ, but there were more whites and more males in the group studied retrospectively. The technical proficiency of the subjects studied prospectively was slightly but significantly less than that of those studied retrospectively. Measures of technical proficiency correlated well with other measures of quality of esophageal speech and were much easier to perform. The understandability of the esophageal speech of the group studied retrospectively was significantly superior. For both groups, understandability was enhanced significantly during audiovisual compared with audio-only presentations. Naive judges had great variability in understanding esophageal speech.
为评估食管语音中有助于有效沟通的那些方面,对一组近期接受喉切除术的前瞻性研究对象(n = 20)在其癌症治疗结束六个月后的食管语音,以及对另一组回顾性研究对象(n = 27)术后6.6年的食管语音应用了一系列测量方法。两组的年龄没有差异,但回顾性研究组中的白人更多,男性也更多。前瞻性研究对象的技术熟练程度略低于回顾性研究对象,但差异显著。技术熟练程度的测量与食管语音质量的其他测量相关性良好,且执行起来容易得多。回顾性研究组的食管语音可懂度明显更高。对于两组而言,与仅音频呈现相比,视听呈现时可懂度显著提高。外行评判者在理解食管语音方面差异很大。