Doody P T, Goldberg M
Clin Exp Dial Apheresis. 1982;6(1):45-51. doi: 10.3109/08860228209050812.
TWelve patients on chronic intermittent peritoneal dialysis for end-state renal disease were followed a total of eight months on high dialysate flow rate (four liters/hour) and low dialysate flow rate (two liters/hour). Creatine, blood urea nitrogen, serum electrolytes, albumin, calcium and phosphorous were recorded weekly. Interdialytic weight gain and intradialytic weight loss were recorded with each dialysis. No significant differences were noted when the mean values were compared for the two trail periods. The two liter/hour dialytic flow rate is less expensive, more convenient for the patients, and could result in a decreased risk for peritonitis when compared to the four liter/hour flow rate. For chronic intermittent peritoneal dialysis, the two liter/hour flow rate should be the preferred mode of therapy.
12名因终末期肾病接受慢性间歇性腹膜透析的患者,分别以高透析液流速(4升/小时)和低透析液流速(2升/小时)进行了为期8个月的随访。每周记录肌酐、血尿素氮、血清电解质、白蛋白、钙和磷的水平。每次透析时记录透析间期体重增加和透析期体重减轻情况。比较两个试验期的平均值时,未发现显著差异。与4升/小时的流速相比,2升/小时的透析液流速成本更低,对患者更方便,且可能降低腹膜炎风险。对于慢性间歇性腹膜透析,2升/小时的流速应作为首选治疗方式。