Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠作为诱导剂的比较。

Midazolam compared with thiopentone as an induction agent.

作者信息

Pakkanen A, Kanto J

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1982 Apr;26(2):143-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01742.x.

Abstract

In patients premedicated with scopolamine + morphine (+5 mg nitrazepam the evening before surgery), the sleep-inducing effect of midazolam 0.15 mg/kg i.v. was clearly slower in onset than that of thiopentone 4.67 mg/kg i.v. Somewhat fewer cardiovascular and local sequelae were found in the midazolam group, but, although apnoea occurred less often in the midazolam group it lasted longer. On the whole, the differences between midazolam and thiopentone had no apparent clinical consequences. Midazolam is a new alternative agent for induction in combination anaesthesia.

摘要

在术前用东莨菪碱+吗啡(手术前一晚加用5毫克硝西泮)进行预处理的患者中,静脉注射0.15毫克/千克咪达唑仑的催眠起效明显慢于静脉注射4.67毫克/千克硫喷妥钠。咪达唑仑组出现的心血管和局部后遗症略少,但尽管咪达唑仑组呼吸暂停发生频率较低,但其持续时间较长。总体而言,咪达唑仑和硫喷妥钠之间的差异没有明显的临床后果。咪达唑仑是联合麻醉诱导的一种新的替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验