• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑用于门诊患者麻醉诱导:与硫喷妥钠的比较。

Midazolam for induction of anaesthesia in outpatients: a comparison with thiopentone.

作者信息

Berggren L, Eriksson I

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Dec;25(6):492-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01693.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01693.x
PMID:7051729
Abstract

Midazolam, a new water-soluble benzodiazepine, with an elimination half-life of approximately 2 h, was compared with thiopentone for induction of general anaesthesia in a randomized, single-blind study. The patients were 60 healthy women undergoing legal abortion as outpatients. Midazolam provided smooth and reliable induction of anaesthesia with few side-effects. However, the induction time was considerably longer in the midazolam group (82.3 + 6.1) than in the thiopentone group (45.9 +/- 1.7s). The dose of midazolam required for induction was 0.36 +/- 0.01 mg/kg, while that of thiopentone was 6.43 +/- 0.21 mg/kg. Apnoea occurred with a frequency of 10% in the midazolam group and 55% in he thiopentone group, but was of equal duration in both groups. Circulatory conditions were more stable during induction with midazolam, with a slower fall in blood pressure and no change in heart rate. The patient were breathing O2/N2O in proportions of 1:2. To ensure adequate surgical anaesthesia, it was necessary to add halothane for short periods for all patients in the midazolam group and for 79% of the thiopentone group. Postoperatively, all patients who had received midazolam, but none induced with thiopentone, had anterograde amnesia; this lasted for more than 1 h. All patients in both groups could leave the hospital after routine postoperative observation for 3-4 h. Venous tolerance was good for both drugs.

摘要

咪达唑仑是一种新型水溶性苯二氮䓬类药物,消除半衰期约为2小时。在一项随机单盲研究中,将其与硫喷妥钠用于全身麻醉诱导进行了比较。患者为60名接受合法门诊人工流产的健康女性。咪达唑仑诱导麻醉平稳可靠,副作用少。然而,咪达唑仑组的诱导时间(82.3±6.1秒)比硫喷妥钠组(45.9±1.7秒)长得多。诱导所需的咪达唑仑剂量为0.36±0.01mg/kg,而硫喷妥钠的剂量为6.43±0.21mg/kg。咪达唑仑组呼吸暂停发生率为10%,硫喷妥钠组为55%,但两组呼吸暂停持续时间相同。咪达唑仑诱导期间循环状况更稳定,血压下降较慢,心率无变化。患者吸入的氧气/氧化亚氮比例为1:2。为确保足够的手术麻醉,咪达唑仑组所有患者和硫喷妥钠组79%的患者都需要短期加用氟烷。术后,所有接受咪达唑仑的患者均出现顺行性遗忘,而硫喷妥钠诱导的患者无一出现;这种遗忘持续超过1小时。两组所有患者在术后常规观察3 - 4小时后均可出院。两种药物的静脉耐受性都良好。

相似文献

1
Midazolam for induction of anaesthesia in outpatients: a comparison with thiopentone.咪达唑仑用于门诊患者麻醉诱导:与硫喷妥钠的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Dec;25(6):492-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1981.tb01693.x.
2
Comparison between midazolam and thiopentone-based balanced anaesthesia for day-case surgery.
Br J Anaesth. 1984 Feb;56(2):165-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/56.2.165.
3
Midazolam compared with thiopentone as a hypnotic component in balanced anaesthesia: a randomized, double-blind study.
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1979 Jan;26(1):42-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03039453.
4
Comparison of midazolam with thiopentone for outpatient anaesthesia.咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠用于门诊麻醉的比较。
N Z Med J. 1983 Mar 23;96(728):210-2.
5
[Comparative study of thiopental and midazolam for induction of anesthesia].硫喷妥钠与咪达唑仑用于麻醉诱导的比较研究
Anaesthesist. 1983 Oct;32(10):478-82.
6
Use of midazolam as an induction agent: comparison with thiopentone.咪达唑仑作为诱导剂的应用:与硫喷妥钠的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1982 Jun;54(6):605-7. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0912(17)46813-9.
7
Comparison of thiopentone and midazolam for induction of anaesthesia: influence of diazepam premedication.硫喷妥钠与咪达唑仑用于麻醉诱导的比较:地西泮术前用药的影响
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1982 May;29(3):227-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03007121.
8
Midazolam as induction agent prior to inhalational anaesthesia: a comparison with thiopentone.咪达唑仑作为吸入麻醉前的诱导剂:与硫喷妥钠的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984 Jun;28(3):249-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1984.tb02053.x.
9
Does thiopentone delay recovery in children premedicated with midazolam?硫喷妥钠会延迟已用咪达唑仑进行术前用药的儿童的恢复吗?
Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7(4):279-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1997.d01-94.x.
10
Haemodynamic effects of midazolam and thiopentone during induction of anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery.咪达唑仑和硫喷妥钠在冠状动脉手术麻醉诱导期间的血流动力学效应。
Br J Anaesth. 1982 Aug;54(8):831-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/54.8.831.

引用本文的文献

1
Midazolam. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.咪达唑仑。对其药理特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1984 Dec;28(6):519-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198428060-00002.
2
Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer intravenous anaesthetic agents.新型静脉麻醉药的临床药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1986 Jan-Feb;11(1):18-35. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198611010-00002.
3
Midazolam: review of a versatile agent for use in dentistry.咪达唑仑:一种用于牙科的多功能药物综述。
Anesth Prog. 1987 Sep-Oct;34(5):164-70.
4
New intravenous anaesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. A review of their properties and clinical use.新型静脉麻醉药和神经肌肉阻滞药。其特性及临床应用综述。
Drugs. 1987 Jul;34(1):98-135. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198734010-00004.
5
Adverse effects of general anaesthetics.全身麻醉药的不良反应。
Drug Saf. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(6):434-59. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199207060-00005.