Sue D Y, Hansen J E, Wasserman K
Am Heart J. 1982 Aug;104(2 Pt 2):442-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90137-5.
On separate days, in double-blind fashion, 23 subjects with mild or moderate asthma were injected intravenously with a placebo or 0.4 mg pindolol. Plethysmographic and spirometric measurements were performed before and after injection and repeatedly after exhausting incremental bicycle ergometer exercise. The mean reduction in maximal exercise heart rate of 26 bpm after pindolol compared to placebo confirmed significant cardiovascular beta blockade. Baseline 1-second vital capacity (FEV1) values and other flow rates were similar in both trials. There were similar reductions in FEV1 (median of 1% to 2% and mean of 3% to 5%) and other flow rates immediately after injection of placebo or pindolol. Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) occurred in 34 of 46 trials and tended to be more severe in subjects with more baseline airway obstruction. Minimal EIB (FEV1 to 80% to 90% of baseline values) developed in eight after taking placebo and in seven after taking pindolol; mild EIB (FEV1 to 60% to 79% of baseline) developed in the five after placebo and six after pindolol and moderate EIB (FEV1 to 40% to 59% of baseline) developed in three after placebo and five after pindolol. In five subjects, FEV1 was reduced to a greater extent after placebo than after pindolol (median of 6%), whereas in 13 subjects, FEV1 was reduced to a greater extent after pindolol than after placebo (median of 10%). These small differences in FEV1 between placebo and pindolol were significant by the t test after exercise but not before exercise. Thus, exercise appears to increase the sensitivity in evaluating airway reactivity in asthmatic patients and also tests the effectiveness of cardiovascular beta blockade.
在不同日期,以双盲方式对23名轻度或中度哮喘患者静脉注射安慰剂或0.4毫克吲哚洛尔。在注射前后以及递增式自行车测力计运动至疲劳后反复进行体积描记法和肺活量测定。与安慰剂相比,吲哚洛尔注射后最大运动心率平均降低26次/分钟,证实存在显著的心血管β受体阻滞。两项试验中的基线1秒用力肺活量(FEV1)值和其他流速相似。注射安慰剂或吲哚洛尔后,FEV1(中位数为1%至2%,平均值为3%至5%)和其他流速立即出现类似程度的下降。46次试验中有34次发生运动诱发性支气管痉挛(EIB),且在基线气道阻塞较严重的患者中往往更严重。服用安慰剂后8人出现最小程度的EIB(FEV1降至基线值的80%至90%),服用吲哚洛尔后7人出现;服用安慰剂后5人出现轻度EIB(FEV1降至基线值的60%至79%),服用吲哚洛尔后6人出现;服用安慰剂后3人出现中度EIB(FEV1降至基线值的40%至59%),服用吲哚洛尔后5人出现。5名受试者中,安慰剂后FEV1下降幅度大于吲哚洛尔后(中位数为6%),而13名受试者中,吲哚洛尔后FEV1下降幅度大于安慰剂后(中位数为10%)。运动后安慰剂和吲哚洛尔之间FEV1的这些微小差异经t检验具有显著性,但运动前不显著。因此,运动似乎增加了评估哮喘患者气道反应性的敏感性,同时也测试了心血管β受体阻滞的有效性。