Busch H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1984;107(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00395484.
Recent advances in molecular biology have raised the hope that understanding of human cancer might progress rapidly and that improvements in therapy might result (Bishop 1983a, b; Busch 1962; Busch 1976; Duesberg 1983). With the development of gene cloning, DNA sequence analysis and improved hybridization methods, it became possible to evaluate whether cancer results from alteration in gene dosage, point or multiple mutation of genes, translocations, deletions, insertions, inversions, cis or trans altered promoters, amplification, and a variety of other genetic factors, including enhancer elements that alter rates of readouts of particular mRNA species. "Onc genes" are under intensive study because they offer manageable probes for evaluation of these various possibilities and also because the study of their cellular analogs may further understanding of the molecular biology of normal fetal and malignant cells. Despite the excessive enthusiasm of some proponents of this field and the negativism of its critics (Bishop 1983 a, b; Duesberg 1983), it is clear that analytical tools and new information will be of value in further studies on experimental cancer, regardless of whether cellular oncogenes (c-onc genes) have anything to do with human cancer or not. In the meantime, studies on enzymes, proteins and epitopes involved in growth processes, have opened new avenues for inhibition of human cancer by quantitative reduction of biosynthetic reactions.
对人类癌症的理解可能会迅速取得进展,治疗方法也可能得到改进(毕晓普,1983a、b;布施,1962;布施,1976;杜斯伯格,1983)。随着基因克隆、DNA序列分析和改进的杂交方法的发展,人们有可能评估癌症是否由基因剂量改变、基因的点突变或多重突变、易位、缺失、插入、倒位、顺式或反式改变的启动子、扩增以及包括增强子元件在内的各种其他遗传因素引起,这些增强子元件会改变特定mRNA种类的读出速率。“癌基因”正在受到深入研究,因为它们为评估这些各种可能性提供了易于处理的探针,也因为对其细胞类似物的研究可能会进一步加深对正常胎儿细胞和恶性细胞分子生物学的理解。尽管该领域的一些支持者过度热情,批评者持否定态度(毕晓普,1983a、b;杜斯伯格,1983),但很明显,无论细胞癌基因(c - onc基因)是否与人类癌症有关,分析工具和新信息在进一步的实验性癌症研究中都将具有价值。与此同时,对生长过程中涉及的酶、蛋白质和表位的研究为通过定量减少生物合成反应来抑制人类癌症开辟了新途径。