McCarthy P L, Cicchetti D V, Stashwick C A, Spiesel S Z, Dolan T F
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1982 Sep;21(9):534-7. doi: 10.1177/000992288202100903.
In order to compare the diagnostic styles of attending pediatricians (A), residents (R), and nurses (N) in judging the degree of illness of a febrile child prior to physical examination, we studied the frequency with which they used 139 different history variables and 186 observation variables in evaluating 162 consecutive children less than or equal to 24 months of age with temperature greater than or equal to 38.3 C. Because individual history and observation variables were not used with sufficient frequency, comparison of diagnostic styles based on the individual variables was not possible. The individual history and observation variables were then combined into 25 history and 30 observation categories respectively. One observation category, "Eyes," was used with sufficient frequency to allow comparison of A, R, and N diagnostic styles. In the Eyes category, there were 11 variables describing visual response to stimuli (e.g., looking at the observer) and 10 variables describing appearance of the eyes (e.g., glassy, shiny). Attendings used variables describing visual response to stimuli significantly more frequently than R or N, which may indicate a greater facility in evaluating age-appropriate behavior and/or may be a technique to increase the sensitivity of clinical judgments. These data demonstrate the variety of diagnostic styles of A, R, and N. There is a need to define valid and reliable observation data to identify serious illness in febrile children.
为了比较主治儿科医生(A)、住院医生(R)和护士(N)在体格检查前判断发热儿童疾病严重程度的诊断方式,我们研究了他们在评估162名年龄小于或等于24个月、体温大于或等于38.3摄氏度的连续儿童时使用139个不同病史变量和186个观察变量的频率。由于各个病史和观察变量的使用频率不足,因此无法基于单个变量比较诊断方式。然后将各个病史和观察变量分别合并为25个病史类别和30个观察类别。其中一个观察类别“眼睛”的使用频率足以比较A、R和N的诊断方式。在“眼睛”类别中,有11个变量描述对刺激的视觉反应(例如,看向观察者),10个变量描述眼睛外观(例如,呆滞、发亮)。主治医生使用描述对刺激的视觉反应的变量的频率明显高于住院医生或护士,这可能表明在评估适龄行为方面更熟练和/或可能是一种提高临床判断敏感性的技巧。这些数据证明了A、R和N诊断方式的多样性。需要定义有效且可靠的观察数据以识别发热儿童的严重疾病。