Liakatas J, Williams A E, Hargreave T B
Fertil Steril. 1982 Aug;38(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46464-2.
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used in an attempt to accurately score morphologic differences in sperm, but early attempts were confounded by tangled preparations. In order to obtain an evenly spread sample, a new technique was evolved where a suspension of sperm cells was filtered and the whole filter prepared for the microscope. Sperm samples were then examined from men with and without obvious clinical and Doppler evidence of a varicocele. All samples were coded and scored; statistically significant differences in sperm morphology between the two groups of men were found. Our conclusions are that the SEM is worthy of further evaluation as a tool in the accurate scoring of sperm morphology, and the presence of a varicocele does appear to have an effect on sperm structure.
扫描电子显微镜(SEM)被用于尝试精确评估精子的形态差异,但早期的尝试因样本制备混乱而受到干扰。为了获得均匀分布的样本,研发出了一种新技术,即对精子细胞悬液进行过滤,并将整个滤膜制备成供显微镜观察的样本。然后对有精索静脉曲张明显临床及多普勒证据的男性和无此证据的男性的精子样本进行检查。所有样本都进行了编码和评分;发现两组男性精子形态存在统计学上的显著差异。我们的结论是,扫描电子显微镜作为精确评估精子形态的工具值得进一步评估,精索静脉曲张的存在似乎确实会对精子结构产生影响。