Micossi P, Mannucci P M, Librenti M C, Raggi U, D'Angelo A, Corallo S, Garimberti B, Bozzini S, Malacco E
Acta Diabetol Lat. 1982 Apr-Jun;19(2):141-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02581150.
One hundred and eight non insulin-dependent diabetics were tested for alcohol flushing after chlorpropamide administration (CPAF test). The overall prevalence of patients who flushed at the first challenge was 32%. However, nearly half of them still flushed after alcohol administration, when placebo was given instead of chlorpropamide, so that the prevalence of 'true' flushers was only 17%. Even though the distribution of retinal lesions was similar in 'true' flushers and in non flushers, severe loss of visual acuity was confined to the non flushers and aspecific flushers. The frequency of pathological ECG findings and of peripheral pulse reduction or abolition was significantly higher in the non flushers and aspecific flushers. Blood pressure, serum lipids and hemostatic parameters were similar in the two groups, and therefore do not explain the differences in prevalence of lesions. This study confirms the previous findings of a lower prevalence of large vessel lesions in flushers; however, the prevalence of 'true' CPAF phenomenon in our out-patient population appears to be much lower than previously reported.
对108名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者进行了氯磺丙脲给药后的酒精潮红测试(CPAF测试)。首次激发时出现潮红的患者总体患病率为32%。然而,当给予安慰剂而非氯磺丙脲时,近一半的患者在饮酒后仍会出现潮红,因此“真正”的潮红者患病率仅为17%。尽管“真正”的潮红者和非潮红者的视网膜病变分布相似,但严重视力丧失仅限于非潮红者和非特异性潮红者。非潮红者和非特异性潮红者的病理性心电图表现以及外周脉搏减弱或消失的频率明显更高。两组的血压、血脂和止血参数相似,因此无法解释病变患病率的差异。本研究证实了先前关于潮红者大血管病变患病率较低的发现;然而,我们门诊人群中“真正”的CPAF现象患病率似乎比先前报道的要低得多。