deSilva N E, Tunbridge W M, Alberti K G
Lancet. 1981 Jan 17;1(8212):128-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)90711-x.
50 diet-treated, non-insulin-dependent diabetics were tested subjectively and objectively for chlorpropamide-alcohol flushing (CPAF) with a single challenge test. Of the 12 (24%) who reported a subjective flush, 9 (18%) also flushed when a placebo was given instead of chlorpropamide, so the true incidence of chlorpropamide-alcohol flushing was 4% (1 patient was not retested with placebo). In a control group of 21 non-diabetics, 2 showed the specific CPAF phenomenon. Temperature measurement did not improve discrimination, but it did show a faster rise in facial temperature in CPAF-positive subjects than in alcohol flushers. This study does not confirm previous higher estimates of the incidence of the CPAF phenomenon in non-insulin-dependent diabetes.
对50名接受饮食治疗的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者进行了单次激发试验,以主观和客观方式检测氯磺丙脲-酒精潮红(CPAF)情况。在报告有主观潮红的12名患者(占24%)中,有9名患者(占18%)在给予安慰剂而非氯磺丙脲时也出现了潮红,因此氯磺丙脲-酒精潮红的实际发生率为4%(有1名患者未用安慰剂重新检测)。在21名非糖尿病患者的对照组中,有2名出现了特定的CPAF现象。体温测量并未提高鉴别能力,但确实显示CPAF阳性受试者面部温度的上升速度比酒精潮红者更快。本研究并未证实先前对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病中CPAF现象发生率的更高估计。