• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于供体人工授精(AID)后父母态度的研究。

A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination (AID).

作者信息

Milsom I, Bergman P

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(2):125-8. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156542.

DOI:10.3109/00016348209156542
PMID:7113687
Abstract

Artificial donor insemination (AID) is important in the treatment of infertility when the couples' wish for a family is denied because of male sterility. However, very little is known regarding the continued development of AID families and their attitudes to insemination after the child is born. The study is based on a questionnaire anonymously completed by 92 couples returning to obtain a second child by insemination. None of the parents regretted his or her decision regarding insemination and the majority were prepared to recommend the method to other couples in the same situation. Apart from one couple the parents intended to withhold the truth from the child regarding its origin. The majority of parents chose not to inform anyone else regarding the child's conception. The parents were therefore anxious that case notes and details concerning insemination were treated with the utmost discretion and confidentiality. The parents in this study clearly indicated they preferred insemination to adoption. A large proportion of the parents who already had a child as a result of insemination returned to the clinic for a second child.

摘要

当夫妻因男性不育而无法实现生育愿望时,人工授精(AID)在不孕症治疗中具有重要意义。然而,关于接受人工授精受孕家庭孩子出生后的后续成长以及他们对人工授精的态度,我们了解得非常少。本研究基于一份问卷展开,该问卷由92对通过人工授精受孕并打算生育第二个孩子的夫妇匿名填写。没有一位父母后悔他们关于人工授精的决定,而且大多数人准备向处于相同情况的其他夫妇推荐这种方法。除了一对夫妇外,其他父母都打算对孩子隐瞒其身世真相。大多数父母选择不向任何人透露孩子的受孕情况。因此,父母们非常担心病例记录和人工授精的细节能得到最严格的保密。本研究中的父母明确表示,他们更倾向于人工授精而非领养。很大一部分已经通过人工授精育有一个孩子的父母又回到诊所来生育第二个孩子。

相似文献

1
A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination (AID).一项关于供体人工授精(AID)后父母态度的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(2):125-8. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156542.
2
[Catamnestic study of 96 couples with heterologous insemination].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1987 Sep;47(9):636-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035891.
3
[Donor artificial insemination. Psychological survey of 830 couples].[供体人工授精。对830对夫妇的心理调查]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1988;17(1):67-74.
4
[Psychosocial situation of married couples prior to artificial insemination with donor sperm].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1984 Nov;44(11):719-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036507.
5
Some attitudes to artificial insemination by donor.
Clin Reprod Fertil. 1983 Jun;2(2):151-60.
6
Couples' reactions to male infertility and donor insemination.
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Sep;137(9):1047-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.9.1047.
7
Attitudes and opinions of donors on an artificial insemination by donor (AID) programme.
Clin Reprod Fertil. 1983 Dec;2(4):249-59.
8
Children from anonymous donors: an inquiry into homosexual and heterosexual parents' attitudes.来自匿名捐赠者的孩子:对同性恋和异性恋父母态度的调查。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14 Suppl:23-35.
9
Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donors.帮助父母告知孩子关于使用供体人工授精(DI)的情况,并确定他们对公开身份精子供体的看法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(1):78-81. doi: 10.1080/00016340500334851.
10
Psychological reactions of couples to artificial insemination with donor sperm.
Int J Fertil. 1979;24(4):240-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The social infertility cycle model.社会不孕症循环模型。
Health Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 4;12(3):183-196. doi: 10.5114/hpr/170986. eCollection 2024.
2
Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?概念化以儿童为中心的范式:在供体受孕生殖中,我们是否有选择的自由?
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Oct;10(3):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7. Epub 2013 Jun 19.