Suppr超能文献

给药频率和给药方案对慢性哮喘患者使用气雾剂类固醇布地奈德反应的影响。

Influence of dosing frequency and schedule on the response of chronic asthmatics to the aerosol steroid, budesonide.

作者信息

Toogood J H, Baskerville J C, Jennings B, Lefcoe N M, Johansson S A

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Oct;70(4):288-98. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90065-3.

Abstract

The influence of various dosing regimens on the response of asthmatic patients to aerosol steroid was investigated. Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid like beclomethasone dipropionate, was given q.i.d. or b.i.d., in the morning or A.M./P.M., at doses of 400, 800, and 1600 micrograms/day. Each patient (n = 34) took every treatment combination for 2 wk. The antiasthmatic and systemic effects, measured by changes in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), blood eosinophils, and serum cortisol levels increased approximately linearly on log dose budesonide (p less than 0.0005). Systemic effects of the drug were nonsignificant at low dosage. At high dosage, morning dosing conserved hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function, but at the cost of a marginal reduction in efficacy (delta PEFR, p = 0.12). Having the dose frequency reduced the antiasthmatic potency of the drug, i.e., PEFR fell by an amount equivalent to approximately eightfold reduction in daily dosage (p = 0.002). This effect was not evident when asthma was in remission but became so with asthma in relapse. Overall, the q.i.d. A.M./P.M. regimen showed the best risk-benefit relationships. The data indicate (1) that reductions in dose frequency made with the hope of improving patient compliance and thus conserving the drug's long-term efficacy are likely to lead to the reverse effect, (2) that the clinician can conserve a better balance of risk vs benefit by titrating dosage in terms of puffs per dose rather than doses per day, and (3) that patients can increase the antiasthmatic efficacy of this aerosol steroid without any increase in drug costs (or apparent risk) by simply increasing dosing frequency. These therapeutic considerations probably apply to some or all of the other topically active steroids currently used to treat asthma.

摘要

研究了不同给药方案对哮喘患者气雾剂类固醇反应的影响。布地奈德是一种局部活性皮质类固醇,类似于二丙酸倍氯米松,每日四次或每日两次给药,分别于上午或上午/下午给药,剂量为400、800和1600微克/天。每位患者(n = 34)接受每种治疗组合2周。通过呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、血液嗜酸性粒细胞和血清皮质醇水平的变化来衡量的抗哮喘和全身效应,在布地奈德对数剂量下大致呈线性增加(p < 0.0005)。该药物在低剂量时全身效应不显著。在高剂量时,早晨给药可保留下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺功能,但以疗效略有降低为代价(PEFR变化,p = 0.12)。减少给药频率会降低药物的抗哮喘效力,即PEFR下降的幅度相当于每日剂量减少约八倍(p = 0.002)。当哮喘缓解时这种效应不明显,但在哮喘复发时则变得明显。总体而言,每日四次上午/下午给药方案显示出最佳的风险效益关系。数据表明:(1)为提高患者依从性从而保留药物长期疗效而减少给药频率可能会产生相反的效果;(2)临床医生通过按每剂量的喷数而非每日剂量来调整剂量,可以更好地保持风险与效益的平衡;(3)患者只需增加给药频率,就能在不增加药物成本(或明显风险)的情况下提高这种气雾剂类固醇的抗哮喘疗效。这些治疗考虑可能适用于目前用于治疗哮喘的部分或全部其他局部活性类固醇。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验