Lazarus R
Med J Aust. 1982 Aug 7;2(3):121-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1982.tb124264.x.
Reference values for a number of lung function tests performed on a group of apparently healthy Victorian power industry workmen are described. Most workers in this industry have had at least incidental exposure to a range of respiratory hazards, including asbestos dust, at some time in their working lives, but men who recalled handling asbestos materials were excluded from the study. Comparison with other published Australian data shows considerable variation. Differences such as measurement technique, equipment calibration, occupational factors, and selection bias must be considered when reference values from published reports are used for clinical or epidemiological purposes.
本文描述了对一组看似健康的维多利亚州电力行业工人进行的多项肺功能测试的参考值。该行业的大多数工人在其职业生涯中的某个时候至少偶然接触过一系列呼吸道危害物,包括石棉粉尘,但回忆起曾处理过石棉材料的男性被排除在研究之外。与其他已发表的澳大利亚数据相比,存在相当大的差异。当将已发表报告中的参考值用于临床或流行病学目的时,必须考虑测量技术、设备校准、职业因素和选择偏倚等差异。